CLR4ILS
Well-Known Member
Re: Oh my my....
[ QUOTE ]
In my experience, after the first couple of years beyond getting their ratings it makes practically no difference where a pilot did his training. The guys that really want to do well and work hard are doing a good job whether they had "top-notch" academy training, or "crappy FBO" training.
[/ QUOTE ]
Disagree....the foundation in basic training is the most important part. It is almost impossible to turn around someones bad habbits formed by $hitty training. Ask any regional SIM instructor. They will tell you hands down they have fewer problems with the candidates that came out of structured, procedural oriented schools.
[ QUOTE ]
Pilots learn more during the first few years of real world flying then they did during initial flight training, and the guys that want to do well can easily (I say again: easily) overcome any perceived disadvantage in quality of initial training.
[/ QUOTE ]
BS.... first compare apples to apples. In the beginning you are building the foundation. When you enter that first 135 job or line job you are honing or sharpening the sword so to speak. If the foundation has not been set properly and good piloting habits formed, then what are you sharpening? Bad habits?
[ QUOTE ]
because real-world flying involves using the basic knowledge learned to that point and putting it into use.
[/ QUOTE ]
Partly true....was the basic knowledge learned taught well, absorbed well, performed well, and most importantly was everything taught to this person? If not, then what is being put to use?
[ QUOTE ]
Ask any pro pilot and they'll tell you that experience means ten times as much as where someone got their ratings. Period. End of story.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, just do not ask the pro pilot that is constantly bitching at his FO because of his bad habits or poor piloting abilities he learned at XYZ FBO...
Damn, why can't this kid do simple descent planning or get stabilized on the approach?
ILS
[ QUOTE ]
In my experience, after the first couple of years beyond getting their ratings it makes practically no difference where a pilot did his training. The guys that really want to do well and work hard are doing a good job whether they had "top-notch" academy training, or "crappy FBO" training.
[/ QUOTE ]
Disagree....the foundation in basic training is the most important part. It is almost impossible to turn around someones bad habbits formed by $hitty training. Ask any regional SIM instructor. They will tell you hands down they have fewer problems with the candidates that came out of structured, procedural oriented schools.
[ QUOTE ]
Pilots learn more during the first few years of real world flying then they did during initial flight training, and the guys that want to do well can easily (I say again: easily) overcome any perceived disadvantage in quality of initial training.
[/ QUOTE ]
BS.... first compare apples to apples. In the beginning you are building the foundation. When you enter that first 135 job or line job you are honing or sharpening the sword so to speak. If the foundation has not been set properly and good piloting habits formed, then what are you sharpening? Bad habits?
[ QUOTE ]
because real-world flying involves using the basic knowledge learned to that point and putting it into use.
[/ QUOTE ]
Partly true....was the basic knowledge learned taught well, absorbed well, performed well, and most importantly was everything taught to this person? If not, then what is being put to use?
[ QUOTE ]
Ask any pro pilot and they'll tell you that experience means ten times as much as where someone got their ratings. Period. End of story.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, just do not ask the pro pilot that is constantly bitching at his FO because of his bad habits or poor piloting abilities he learned at XYZ FBO...
Damn, why can't this kid do simple descent planning or get stabilized on the approach?
ILS