I'm sorry for insulting your intelligence. As I Client of NJ, I'm am very informed of the set up as we had some legal issues to negotiate around when we hired you. And it's not like I spent 10 years in the Frac industry and I'll call our sells guy and tell him he is wrong about the share in the plane we own . And explain to me how Cessna is getting 35 Xs back, if NJ own them? If you can explain that, I'll call the head of used aircraft and let him know they are not coming.
Well this thread got weird in a hurry.
We don't own or are financially obligated to any aircraft. We don't bring an aircraft on until it has enough owners to be bought.
And who I currently work for has nothing to with who I've worked for and or done in the past or currently help people do outside of my job. I'm glad NJ has allowed you so much access to the financing of the jets and hope you were able to give them some advice. We will agree to disagree.
I had an old boss who used to say "if you can't write a check for it, you can't afford it."
There is no agree to disagree. You are not in the know, and you are flat out wrong. Just because you worked for CitationAir 10 years ago, doesn't mean you have the slightest idea on how NetJets operates financially, or what you are talking about. Quit acting like a 12 year old know it all, the statement "and hope you were able to give them some advice" is comically childish. Only one of us is involving themselves with HOW a company operates financially. I find it borderline disturbing that somebody who works for the company, who called fleet management today to ask them about aircraft purchasing and leasing, is being argued against by some outsider.
TMC bought many of NetJets' Beechjets.
The question I've got is "Why does it matter how or if NetJets owns or leases the aircraft?"
Let's say NJ leases the aircraft from a leasing company, and subleases them to fractional owners. So what? Let's say NJ buys aircraft outright, and leases them to fractional owners. So what? Let's say NJ buys aircraft and sells shares in the aircraft and has little or no equity in the planes it operates. So what?
I'm not sure why it matters.
The question I've got is "Why does it matter how or if NetJets owns or leases the aircraft?"
Let's say NJ leases the aircraft from a leasing company, and subleases them to fractional owners. So what? Let's say NJ buys aircraft outright, and leases them to fractional owners. So what? Let's say NJ buys aircraft and sells shares in the aircraft and has little or no equity in the planes it operates. So what?
I'm not sure why it matters.
The original post was about, what NJ does with their old planes? And that kicked off the idea the NJ does not own them, which I say is false, and NJ does not lease them, which is also not true . The person countering these arguments has not answered the few simple questions asked. If these were answered with, instead we got personal about. Which I apologize, I meant them not as such. But to assume I know nothing because I don't swing gear for them is false.
If I could "like" this ten times, I would!This is an issue which is critically important to me. I will not consider purchasing a share until we get to the bottom of this.
Could you two please go on another five pages? Thanks.
Your avatar is quite appropriate to this post. Well done.What the hell happened here? All I do is ask a simple question and this happens!