UPS MD-11

Umm why would you need nosewell access? I mean I guess if you had to confirm a gear down but thats the only situation I can think of. Other than a emergency evacuation down the nosewell if you cant get out thru the main doors.
 
In case you were confused, or forgetful, I am a Blackhawk pilot. Ney: a Blackhawk Aviator.

Giggle.

Seriously thanks for saving me the trouble of having to say all of that.

You must not be stating that enough on here, if you have to constantly tell retelling everyone.
 
Umm why would you need nosewell access? I mean I guess if you had to confirm a gear down but thats the only situation I can think of. Other than a emergency evacuation down the nosewell if you cant get out thru the main doors.
Bragging rights
 
Umm why would you need nosewell access? I mean I guess if you had to confirm a gear down but thats the only situation I can think of. Other than a emergency evacuation down the nosewell if you cant get out thru the main doors.

It's a tight fit in there and through that door, so not something I can access into the aircraft through when geared up, but could very well likely be an additional exit if needed, and if for some reason the sliding windows and escape ropes weren't available.
 
I'm no expert, but I don't think we have squat. I'm a 76 guy and KNOW I don't have squat but can't officially comment on the MD. That said, the pics Mike shows on Fedex MD11's isn't something I believe UPS has. It should also be noted that the claim that batteries caused the downing of flight 6, according to the battery lobby and the cargo airlines, was not officially proven, and therefore it did not happen. Have a nice day...

If you come into SDF, the Dlamp and Mbell arrivals are named for the flight 6 crew. I think that's pretty kewl.
 
We only have active fire suppression in the belly cargo compartments (class C) on the MD’s with two metered fire bottles that can be shot into the aft or forward compartments.

Main cargo compartment have smoke and overheat detectors (class D) but no active fire suppression other than fire resistant cargo containers and the ability to shut off air to that area...which does little to fight a Lithium battery fire.
 
Last edited:
It's a tight fit in there and through that door, so not something I can access into the aircraft through when geared up, but could very well likely be an additional exit if needed, and if for some reason the sliding windows and escape ropes weren't available.

It is a tight fit and if the Capt’s seat is moved aft it becomes almost inaccessible. The A300 has a pretty nice E/E access door much like the MD only larger and not potentially blocked by the Capt’s seat. We always referred to it as the door to the lower wine cellar. It’s a French thing.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: bp
Umm why would you need nosewell access? I mean I guess if you had to confirm a gear down but thats the only situation I can think of. Other than a emergency evacuation down the nosewell if you cant get out thru the main doors.

In the whale, if there’s not cargo on top of it we have a hatch with access to the E&E which then has access to the outside world. Our FME uses it for engine starts when we don’t have any ground staff available.
 
We only have active fire suppression in the belly cargo compartments (class C) on the MD’s with two metered fire bottles that can be shot into the aft or forward compartments.

Main cargo compartment have smoke and overheat detectors (class D) but no active fire suppression other than fire resistant cargo containers and the ability to shut off air to that area...which does little to fight a Lithium battery fire.

So...it's a trucking company.
 
Baghdad has pretty sunsets too.

20151105_164624.jpg

Just like being in Jamaica, but with mortar fire
 
I'm no expert, but I don't think we have squat. I'm a 76 guy and KNOW I don't have squat but can't officially comment on the MD. That said, the pics Mike shows on Fedex MD11's isn't something I believe UPS has. It should also be noted that the claim that batteries caused the downing of flight 6, according to the battery lobby and the cargo airlines, was not officially proven, and therefore it did not happen. Have a nice day...

If you come into SDF, the Dlamp and Mbell arrivals are named for the flight 6 crew. I think that's pretty kewl.
Forgive my ignorance, but I always thought it was batteries that started a fire which made it impossible for the crew to see anything. If that wasn't the cause of the accident, what was? Again, not trying to be argumentative, you got me curious to the actual cause. Thanks!
 
Forgive my ignorance, but I always thought it was batteries that started a fire which made it impossible for the crew to see anything. If that wasn't the cause of the accident, what was? Again, not trying to be argumentative, you got me curious to the actual cause. Thanks!

I believe he’s being sarcastic. We all know that the LiOn batteries lit off and continued to burn. Lobbyists and airlines tried hard to spin the narrative into we don’t know what kind of fire could bring down a 74 with fire suppression activated but we can’t prove it was LiOn batteries. So we now can keep shipping unsafe amounts in cargo aircraft because no one cares that a couple freight dawgs died. Profits over safety.
 
Baghdad has pretty sunsets too.

You know, the google search function is free to you too.

You and I have entirely different view points on "safety."

200+ dead in a riot. Entire neighborhoods burned down. Okay, you win; I'm just misinformed.
So you've never been there, but your internet search says it's scary.
Might as well view the grand canyon from the safety of your computer screen to. I mean Detroit and Chicago probably had 5 murders last night.
 
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-...ge-lithium-batteries-suspected-some-accidents

(PRBA is the rechargeable battery association which is a lobby group in Washington DC. Members include three large cargo airlines)

"The PRBA also noted that it has yet to be proved that lithium batteries caused two of the key accidents the FAA cited in its report, the 2006 UPS DC-8 fire in Philadelphia and the UPS 747 crash in Dubai. “The FAA assumes that ‘bulk shipments of lithium batteries (primary and secondary)….were likely contributors to two of the freighter fire accidents that occurred on U.S.-registered airplanes.’ This assumption is unfounded. In fact, the NTSB’s report on the 2006 UPS airplane incident does not identify any ‘bulk shipments’ (e.g., pallets) of lithium ion or lithium metal batteries on board the aircraft. While it is true there were several large consignments of lithium batteries on the UPS plane involved in the Dubai incident, there is nothing in the UAE GCAA reports that indicates bulk shipments of lithium batteries were ‘likely contributors’ to the accident.”
 
Back
Top