ABX was still flying DC-8-60s out of ATL when I would roll through there in my check hauling days. It was always a race to get to shelter before they fired up the huffer to get the mighty Douglas on its way.
Later when I was flying charter we went ILN and got to tour their training facility and they still had the sim for that thing there. We didn’t get to fly it or anything but it was still cool to see.
I know it's taboo to be nostalgic these days but I really wish i was around to fly the 727 and DC-8. The "golden age" of aviation sounded fun. (minus the hijackings, strikes, bankruptcies, rampant accidents, and lack of CRM)
I miss the plane spotting from that generation. I lived about 20 NM NW of ATL and I spent hours upon hours watching departures with my binoculars. So many cool looking jets back in the day. Now? A bunch of meh. At least I am close to an AF base that gets a lot of pretty awesome transient traffic.I know it's taboo to be nostalgic these days but I really wish i was around to fly the 727 and DC-8. The "golden age" of aviation sounded fun. (minus the hijackings, strikes, bankruptcies, rampant accidents, and lack of CRM)
ABX was still flying DC-8-60s out of ATL when I would roll through there in my check hauling days. It was always a race to get to shelter before they fired up the huffer to get the mighty Douglas on its way.
Later when I was flying charter we went ILN and got to tour their training facility and they still had the sim for that thing there. We didn’t get to fly it or anything but it was still cool to see.
That's for another thread. But the "good ole days" weren't really that "good" for alot of people. And for aviation, the safety record back then vs. now makes the nostalgia a bit off the mark.Why is it taboo? Some cool and fun stuff went on back in the day. Both during my time, as I realize these days, as well as before my time, which is my own thoughts of nostalgia.
Yea i look back at some of my first plane spotting photos, you would think they were from 30 years ago....•. Anyways. Funny enough i stumbled upon a FLL folder and it was filled with the likes of Song, Ted, Laker Airways.I miss the plane spotting from that generation. I lived about 20 NM NW of ATL and I spent hours upon hours watching departures with my binoculars. So many cool looking jets back in the day. Now? A bunch of meh. At least I am close to an AF base that gets a lot of pretty awesome transient traffic.
I know it's taboo to be nostalgic these days but I really wish i was around to fly the 727 and DC-8. The "golden age" of aviation sounded fun. (minus the hijackings, strikes, bankruptcies, rampant accidents, and lack of CRM)
Throw in a little L1011 love, too!I know it's taboo to be nostalgic these days but I really wish i was around to fly the 727 and DC-8. The "golden age" of aviation sounded fun. (minus the hijackings, strikes, bankruptcies, rampant accidents, and lack of CRM)
I always liked ABex's unique cargo containers that actually loaded through the passenger entry door vs having a big cargo door!When I flew 135 cargo in the mid-90s, we had routes for both UPS and for ABX. ABX would bring in their DC-8s or DC-9s that we’d park next to, to get sorted and transloaded cargo to our planes. I always thought their light-grey pilot uniforms were as distinctive as the UPS brown ones.
There were a couple of reasons the DC-8 soldiered on long after the 707. The first one was its ability to be stretched. Because of the way Boeing made the gear on the 707, it couldn't be stretched any further than the -320 without banging the tail. The DC-8 was able to be stretched into the -60 series. Secondly, I've heard Douglas never put a lifetime limit on the airframe of the DC-8. The 707 had a timeout point on the airframe.I heard a story a long time ago and I don't know if it's true. The 707 and the DC-8 were competitors way back in the olden times and they were both loud, smoky monsters. Boeing was also building KC-135s during the Cold War to maintain our "defensive" posture. Eventually the USAF said these engines are outdated and we want a more efficient option so they re-engined all of the KC-135s. The airlines flying 707s were aware of this upgrade and wanted it but Boeing was not going to make it available for civilian operators because they had new airplane models to sell to the airlines. In the meantime Douglas re-engined the fleet of DC-8s for their customers happily. The 707 quickly disappeared, the DC-8 kept going for a while and the KC-135 continues to to operate. I have no idea of the morality of this story, it is what it is. I think a DC-8 went supersonic in a dive once but I have no evidence to back that up.
I've also heard Douglas didn't have airframe life limits, I've also heard those airplanes were purposefully overbuilt and heavy. Turns out trying to design an airplane that can last forever isn't really possible. Technology and economics constantly evolve, sometimes manufacturers get ahead of themselves and stub their toe, just look at the 757 and imagine what the C-suite at Boeing currently thinks about stopping production, imagine a next gen 757 with new engines and avionics. Airbus offers exactly that with the A321 and possibly the 322. I don't understand it but I'm not very smart.There were a couple of reasons the DC-8 soldiered on long after the 707. The first one was its ability to be stretched. Because of the way Boeing made the gear on the 707, it couldn't be stretched any further than the -320 without banging the tail. The DC-8 was able to be stretched into the -60 series. Secondly, I've heard Douglas never put a lifetime limit on the airframe of the DC-8. The 707 had a timeout point on the airframe.
And yes, the DC-8 did go supersonic during a test flight. A -43 broke the sound barrier in 1961 on said test flight.
That's for another thread. But the "good ole days" weren't really that "good" for alot of people. And for aviation, the safety record back then vs. now makes the nostalgia a bit off the mark.
Because of the way Boeing made the gear on the 707, it couldn't be stretched any further than the -320 without banging the tail. The DC-8 was able to be stretched into the -60 series.
Throw in a little L1011 love, too!