WacoFan
Bigly
Waco,
I seriously doubt this was about a passing comment made about a hat. I could be wrong, and maybe this guy broke bad. However, I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
Unfortunately in this business, there are guys with pretty strong personalities. Things can get ugly, and the stress level among pilot groups these days are pretty high to begin with.
So it seems to me that he takes the old IMSAFE checklist that the FAA pays lip service to, and made a decision not to endanger his passengers.
(Remember the FAA does not support pilots with this, they will just crucify any who dont follow ex post facto). Read that statement from the FAA spokesperson, or here's the translation: We expect pilots to not fly if they are unsafe, but we wont lift a finger to ensure that there is no retribution for following our rules.
Here is an ironclad law of the FAA- they will not interefere in management in any company barring breaking of a FAR. The onus is on the pilot and the consequences too.
He obviously knew there would be consequences for his decision, but made his decision and according to you he doesnt belong in the left seat??????
Never said that he didn't belong in the seat per se, I said that if the issue was truly something as trivial as was stated here and other places then yes, he may not. If there was some catastrophic back-story that is one thing, but at what point do people have to draw the line? I also supported the guy calling off the flight. I guess I should have posed it more as a question: At what point should someone who does this be looked at, or would looking at him at all or having any retribution to him completely wipe out the spirit of the needed protection of calling off a flight?