U.S. Airline Industry Headed Toward 'Catastrophe'

intern_mike

E-175 f/o
U.S. Airline Industry Headed Toward 'Catastrophe' at Current Oil Prices
Friday June 13, 12:01 am ET
Several Airlines Likely to Fail; Affordable, Frequent Air Travel and Jobs at Risk

WASHINGTON and RADNOR, Pa., June 13 /PRNewswire/ -- At current oil prices, several large and small U.S. airlines will default on their obligations to creditors beginning at the end of 2008 and early 2009, according to a study issued today by AirlineForecasts, LLC and the Business Travel Coalition. The study shows that $130/barrel oil prices will increase yearly airline costs by $30 billion, while airlines will be able to generate only $4 billion in fare increases and incremental fees. The implication of this alarming trend is that several large and small airlines will ultimately end up in bankruptcy, and of those, some will be forced to liquidate.
For a full copy of the study, go to http://tinyurl.com/6qhh99

"If oil prices stay anywhere near $130/barrel, all major legacy airlines will be in default on various debt covenants by the end of 2008 or early 2009," the study conducted by AirlineForecasts for BTC states. "U.S. commercial aviation is in full blown crisis and heading toward a catastrophe."

"Airlines are the primary source of inter-city transportation, critical to national and local economic development, the flow of human capital, movement of just-in-time parts for manufacturing, perishable food and other goods critical to our economy," the study says. "With airlines gravely threatened, so is our economic well-being."

Findings:
-- The top 10 U.S. airlines will spend almost $25 billion in higher fuel
costs this year over last year when jet fuel averaged $2.11 per gallon.
Fuel hedge benefits could offset $5 to $6 billion of the increased fuel
costs.
-- Earnings for the group, when one-time reorganization charges are
removed, were less than $4 billion in 2007, the only year of
profitability this decade. The group could lose as much as $9 billion
over the next 12 months if the current range of oil prices holds.
-- Industry fares will have to increase at least 20% -- across the board
and on average -- just to cover the dramatic gap-up in fuel costs from
2007. This is not possible given the level of uneconomic seat capacity
in the system today.
-- The upshot of higher fares is less traffic, and given a reasonable
estimate of price elasticity, the industry will eventually be forced to
shrink its seat capacity by 15% to 20%. However, there is no guarantee
that a transition to a smaller, more expensive (for the consumer)
airline industry would be successful and sustainable.
-- Airlines have the ability to raise some cash, and moreover, suppliers
such as aircraft manufacturers, leasing companies and travel management
companies will have an incentive to support large airlines that provide
a stream of value. Nevertheless, without a swift reduction in the price
of fuel, the industry is headed toward a massive failure that will
result in more bankruptcies, including liquidations.

"The U.S. airlines, and those who depend on them, are watching with growing alarm as their cash reserves fall precipitously toward zero as the price of oil, already at unsustainable levels, continuously spikes into uncharted territory," the study says. "These airlines have never faced a darker future."

"Brand name legacy carriers that we and American communities from coast to coast have depended upon for decades to provide us with affordable, frequent air service are running out of cash, and therefore, toward a date with bankruptcy and liquidation," the report warns.

"Airlines can attempt to radically shrink the industry," the study states. "But given the competitive situation they face, it's highly unlikely that they will have the ability to reduce capacity to levels that will allow all of them to survive. Instead, absent direct policy intervention, the likelihood is several airlines will fail."

"Stabilizing this ailing industry must become a national policy priority," the report states. "Many Members of Congress, federal regulatory officials, state legislators and Governors have yet to fully appreciate the devastating impact an oil-crippled airline industry will wreak on our culture and our national and local economies."
 
Although it comes off as a too-simple answer...

Re-regulation.

Not that the government does a great job of anything, at least it removes the competition factor, which is the motivation NOT to raise fares to reflect rising fuel/operating costs.
 
I don't see why it's so difficult to just charge the passengers what it costs to operate the flight.
 
I don't see why it's so difficult to just charge the passengers what it costs to operate the flight.

:yeahthat:

They're afraid that passengers will go to other airlines.

Well, with 80 percent load factors and with everyone cutting capacity, where are they going to go?

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Someone's got to have the balls to say, screw it, I'm charging what I need to charge, and if you don't like it, good luck finding a seat on another airline because their planes are all full.

Inexpensive air travel is like inexpensive gas. It's not a constitutional right and people need to get that through their heads. Or they can take Greyhound.
 
I don't see why it's so difficult to just charge the passengers what it costs to operate the flight.

The problem occurs when a few of them do exactly that, but some of the other airlines don't follow suit, at least for awhile. The cheaper airline gets the extra passengers, while the more expensive airliners have far fewer passengers and get their asses handed to them by the cheaper operation. They all try to cut each other's throats and drive their competition to oblivion. People just buy the cheapest tickets more often than not. Customer service is often just as bad at one carrier as another, so why be loyal?

And it seems the few exceptions to the rule, still have problems anyways just to try to compete. Personally I think Frontier is excellent, but they don't seem to be doing all that well at the moment.
 
It seems like this has been a long time comming for the airline world. They all try impossible business models to exist on, and now things are finally catching up with them.

I think a lot of us pilots should probably be grateful with the jobs we do have, cause there a bit more than light chop on the ride ahead for most of us.
 
You know, the day I hear a news report about how great the airlines are doing and what a profitable, sucessful industry this is, I will go to the local bottle shop, buy the most expensive singe-malt scotch they have, and bong the whole thing in the parking lot out of sheer shock and delight.

You're all invited, of course.
 
Yesterday on the way to work I saw one of those electronic signs on the side of the road saying "All parking lots at ATL almost full, tune to (radio station) for more information".....Load factors are good, people are flying, raise prices, less people will fly, trim capacity to meet demand....BINGO.

Then as airlines burn less fuel, the ######bags who are capitalizing off of this "crisis" (speculators) will start selling and things will return closer to normal....I hope
 
Yesterday on the way to work I saw one of those electronic signs on the side of the road saying "All parking lots at ATL almost full, tune to (radio station) for more information".....Load factors are good, people are flying, raise prices, less people will fly, trim capacity to meet demand....BINGO.
Oh man! I don't know what was up w/ the previous two days but the parking lots at MSP were also FULL. All general parking was taken up and short term parking was 85% taken.
 
Yesterday on the way to work I saw one of those electronic signs on the side of the road saying "All parking lots at ATL almost full, tune to (radio station) for more information".....Load factors are good, people are flying, raise prices, less people will fly, trim capacity to meet demand....BINGO.

Then as airlines burn less fuel, the ######bags who are capitalizing off of this "crisis" (speculators) will start selling and things will return closer to normal....I hope

Oh man! I don't know what was up w/ the previous two days but the parking lots at MSP were also FULL. All general parking was taken up and short term parking was 85% taken.

Surprise gentlemen. It's called summertime! :)
 
:yeahthat:

They're afraid that passengers will go to other airlines.

Well, with 80 percent load factors and with everyone cutting capacity, where are they going to go?
well, exactly....although, i think if one airline raises it's costs...others would follow and then everyone would be paying about the same cost.

could be that the airlines are afraid people will just stop flying altogether? the only loophole there is the price of gas to drive anywhere is just as high now.
 
:yeahthat:

They're afraid that passengers will go to other airlines.

Well, with 80 percent load factors and with everyone cutting capacity, where are they going to go?

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Someone's got to have the balls to say, screw it, I'm charging what I need to charge, and if you don't like it, good luck finding a seat on another airline because their planes are all full.

Inexpensive air travel is like inexpensive gas. It's not a constitutional right and people need to get that through their heads. Or they can take Greyhound.

:yeahthat:

Exactly. It is basic economics. Capacity is being decreased across the board. Charge 15%-20% more for the ticket. Passengers will flock to the "low-cost carriers" and fill those seats months in advance. Which leaves everyone else out of luck and having to pay for the more expensive ticket. Who is going to buy those higher priced tickets? Everyone. I sure as heck know they won't be driving. Even if prices are raised 15-20%, it is STILL the cheapest way to travel.

In the past 2 months, I have flown into Las Vegas, two destinations in Florida, Texas, Memphis, and Chicago. Not one airplane was less than 90% full. People will continue to fly.

Michael
 
:yeahthat:

They're afraid that passengers will go to other airlines.

Well, with 80 percent load factors and with everyone cutting capacity, where are they going to go?

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Someone's got to have the balls to say, screw it, I'm charging what I need to charge, and if you don't like it, good luck finding a seat on another airline because their planes are all full.

Inexpensive air travel is like inexpensive gas. It's not a constitutional right and people need to get that through their heads. Or they can take Greyhound.

Last I heard, Greyhound just started charging $25 for each bag you want to check. And their ticket prices have gone way up also. It isn't too surprising given the cost of diesel fuel. Ten years ago I took a bus from Phoenix, AZ to Burlington, VT for $70, baggage included. Granted it took four days, but for that price I couldn't complain. I certainly couldn't do that these days.
 
The anti-competitive strategies of the legacies (take the losses till the little guy folds) are all the more despicable because when they finally screw themselves in to oblivion guess who picks up the check to refloat them because they are a "national infrastructure"? Yeah. We do. It's a no-lose racket. Lot of that going around lately.
 
The anti-competitive strategies of the legacies (take the losses till the little guy folds) are all the more despicable because when they finally screw themselves in to oblivion guess who picks up the check to refloat them because they are a "national infrastructure"? Yeah. We do. It's a no-lose racket. Lot of that going around lately.

If you're referring to the post-9/11 bailout, the articles I remember reading showed that the government actually made money off the money loaned to the airlines.
 
Links please. If you mean that the government wrote a profit because they were paid back in their own deflated funny-money, then uh, great. Regardless, what makes the legacies so special that I get to loan them money so they can lose some more while the guys at ATA get put on the street?
 
well, exactly....although, i think if one airline raises it's costs...others would follow and then everyone would be paying about the same cost.

could be that the airlines are afraid people will just stop flying altogether? the only loophole there is the price of gas to drive anywhere is just as high now.

Except there's always one or two mavericks in the group that stick with their current prices, and the ones that raised their fares generally roll them back in fear of losing passengers. The fare hike last week was rolled back b/c they said they saw a significant drop in bookings. I say there's not enough info to say the fare hike was the reason. I have a feeling the crunch on disposable income across most of the tax brackets in America had more to do with the decrease in bookings than a $15 fare hike.
 
Back
Top