Sure. You just have to attend training for both operators.Hard to find info so figure I throw it out the sharks to feed on.
Can a pilot fly for two part 135 companies? Doing contract work for both?
That's an interesting question! Do you mean two separate a/c training events or just both company's indoc and recurrent training? (assuming he is flying the same a/c for both companies.)Sure. You just have to attend training for both operators.
For 135 it would be both indocs and initial training even if the same aircraft.That's an interesting question! Do you mean two separate a/c training events or just both company's indoc and recurrent training? (assuming he is flying the same a/c for both companies.)
This. The feds up here want all commercial flying for each company listed on both flight and duty records.The duty and flight time is cumulative for both, so they both have to agree and abide by any required rest etc that occurs.
They don't. This used to be common practice, especially for contract pilots but the FAA decided that your checkride is only good for 1 carrier. Even if it's the same airplane. The guidance for that is probably in the 8900.1You would need to do indoc for both, my question would be for training would you have to do checks with the check airman from each or would one carry over...
Well you can do the ride with a fed to.That is what I thought... as I know the check airman are specific to your company...
I don't have the language or the desire to dig through the 8900 and/or interpretations, although I'm sure it's in there. I just hate searching those two things. Nothing ever comes up. You can know the interpretation name and date and you won't find it.I was thinking the 297/293 aircraft specific... The 299 is company specific as well, correct?
Yes you can, I suppose it depends on the operation
Keep in mind also, if you fail a 135 ride for one operator you may not fly for the other until you complete a recheck successfully.
135.297a
Guess it depends on how you interpret it.