Transition from a Piper Seminole to Seneca

I guess if your Seminole didn't have the turbos then that'd be something to become familiar with.
 
I guess if your Seminole didn't have the turbos then that'd be something to become familiar with.

Depends. He could be in a Seneca I, with out the turbo's. Which probably would be a 50/50 bet, if its a training airplane. Hate to be running training with turbo's.
 
Depends. He could be in a Seneca I, with out the turbo's. Which probably would be a 50/50 bet, if its a training airplane. Hate to be running training with turbo's.
Oh, it's not that bad. You just keep the power way back for 99% of the flight and only let them push it up for takeoff/go around. Works pretty well...everything just happens a little slower.

-mini
 
True. I guess I just assumed he was getting checked out in one.

That could be true too. Guess we sit and wait.

minitour said:
Oh, it's not that bad. You just keep the power way back for 99% of the flight and only let them push it up for takeoff/go around. Works pretty well...everything just happens a little slower.

I'd agree with that. I recently got checked out in a Turbo Arrow, for no real reason, other than to learn to how to deal with the turbo's. Nothing hard about it, just have to make sure you are indeed paying attention, rather than just jamming the throttles to the stops.
 
I did the transition from the Seminole to the Seneca I (non-turbo) and the only real difference I noticed was on landing. Noseheaviness and extreme sluggishness/lack of control effectiveness on the ailerons.
 
I'd agree with that. I recently got checked out in a Turbo Arrow, for no real reason, other than to learn to how to deal with the turbo's. Nothing hard about it, just have to make sure you are indeed paying attention, rather than just jamming the throttles to the stops.
Just don't run it over square or shock cool it and you'll be alright.

.......now where'd I put that sarcasm smiley?

-mini
 
Consider using the 2nd notch of flaps for landing rather than full. This is how we normally landed...

As was said above, the plane is nose heavy especially without passengers in the back. A little less flaps helps keep the nose up without having much of a performance penalty on landing speeds.

You'll see there isn't much clearance between the props and the ground, the danger with hitting the nose is getting into an occillation and smacking a prop.
 
Learned in a Seneca IV, later flew the Seminole a little bit.

Differences? The Seneca is all around much, much cooler. (as in awesome, and in a literal sense, if it's got A/C;))

Glad I could be of help. :)
 
Pretty much how I remember it from 2002ish when I last flew the two together

Yeah ditto to the heaver in the nose thing, but only when you don't have any weight in the back. The Seneca flares nicely if someone is ridding in the back. It does better single engine, but you probably won't notice anything spectacular.
 
Back
Top