TIER 1!

How good is the catering?
How about $225,000? We're negotiating, right?

Uhhhh, how good is the catering? Can I get a meal voucher since I probably won't be able to get food in SJU? Also this qualifies for hazard pay, so 50% override on the hourly rate will be necessary.
 
Thank you!

When you see how hysterical the media gets about a subject we are expert about, makes you wonder all accurate all the other stuff they talk about that you're not so knowledgable about are.

It is called the murray gell-man amnesia effect.


The Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect
Posted on January 31, 2006


Jack Kelly has a nice piece on media (in)credibility, where he quotes from Michael Crichton’s 2002 “Why Speculate?”:

Media carries with it a credibility that is totally undeserved. You have all experienced this, in what I call the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. (I call it by this name because I once discussed it with Murray Gell-Mann, and by dropping a famous name I imply greater importance to myself, and to the effect, than it would otherwise have.)

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect works as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward-reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story-and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read with renewed interest as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about far-off Palestine than it was about the story you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I’d point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all.

But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn’t. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia.
 
my issue with it isnt the weather in the air. its the decision making that is the issue. One mx issue and that airplane is toast, and the crew is stuck riding out a hurricane.
 
my issue with it isnt the weather in the air. its the decision making that is the issue. One mx issue and that airplane is toast, and the crew is stuck riding out a hurricane.
I would imagine that they had Boeing and the FAA on speed dial in case they needed a ferry permit or something. I would imagine that short of something that physically prevented the aircraft from leaving (blown tire, one engine won't fire up , etc) that airplane was getting home one way or another.
 
I would imagine that they had Boeing and the FAA on speed dial in case they needed a ferry permit or something. I would imagine that short of something that physically prevented the aircraft from leaving (blown tire, one engine won't fire up , etc) that airplane was getting home one way or another.
That little guy? Don't worry about that little guy.


Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top