Autothrust Blue
”…trusting ze process…”
Ain't gonna look over there and unilaterally decide the other guy (gal) (fox) is going to do an extension. No way.I rarely have taken an extension. When I have I talked it over with the FO.
@Acrofox
Ain't gonna look over there and unilaterally decide the other guy (gal) (fox) is going to do an extension. No way.I rarely have taken an extension. When I have I talked it over with the FO.
Ain't gonna look over there and unilaterally decide the other guy (gal) (fox) is going to do an extension. No way.
@Acrofox
I hope you unbuckled your seat belt while dialing Crew Suppression to call in fatigued if that happened to you. (That's the recourse, I guess.)You might not, but that sentiment isn't always shared by all. I have that t-shirt, thank you kindly. Also, thank you for being a good Captain. Or soon to be. Or whatever. You know what I mean tall Derg!
I'm not a fan of that part of the reg, but it is what it is. I don't know many captains who would accept an extension when their FO didn't want to.
I hope you unbuckled your seat belt while dialing Crew Suppression to call in fatigued if that happened to you. (That's the recourse, I guess.)
Yeah, that's just wrong. I know bloody well what the regulation says, but the fitness of both crewmembers is required and should be considered in the Captain's decision to accept an extension.
I was agreeing with you.Ain't gonna look over there and unilaterally decide the other guy (gal) (fox) is going to do an extension. No way.
@Acrofox
That's a relief.We were at the gate, and fortunately for him I was ok with extending but I certainly addressed the issue of speaking on my behalf, particularly when it came to safety and/or duty issues. It was an entirely civil discussion and the rest of the trip was pretty enjoyable. He was brand new to both the airplane and the seat and it didn't cross his mind. Dude now flies for a legacy and we keep in touch, and it's a solid "tell me about a time" nugget for potential interviews. Had it not been civil then I'd have had no problem following your recommended course of action.
I figured you were. I merely amplified.I was agreeing with you.
Even then I take a long hard look at the FO to make sure he/she is really ok. Many will take your lead even if they are tired. I also make it clear to them that if they are too tired the decision will be mine, I will not throw them under the bus.
Finally, remember that taking the extension means you are good for the entire flight. I've regretted taking them a few times an hour or so later as we are in cruise and the FO and I are feeling it. I am very, very hesitant to take them now.
I'm not a fan of that part of the reg, but it is what it is. I don't know many captains who would accept an extension when their FO didn't want to.
Entry of your password into the ACARS initialization page constitutes agreement to a duty extension....I hope you unbuckled your seat belt while dialing Crew Suppression to call in fatigued if that happened to you. (That's the recourse, I guess.)
Yeah, that's just wrong. I know bloody well what the regulation says, but the fitness of both crewmembers is required and should be considered in the Captain's decision to accept an extension.
For short ones, yes.Entry of your password into the ACARS initialization page constitutes agreement to a duty extension....
Hasn't been an issue yet.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I had this situation arise a few weeks ago. Was flying with a capt that I was good friends with and respected. Weather was over the hub airport where I happened to live and the ramp kept reopening and closing. It was a 5 leg day and we were going to have to take a 2 hr extension on a 12.5 hr duty day. He wanted to take the extension just because he was a commuter and wanted a hotel for the night. I called scheduling and refused my extension. Per normal procedures I was required to conference call with the CP. CP was on another call at the time. They let me leave with the understanding that CP would call me back. Long story short, when I did talk to the CP I was told that FO's couldn't refuse extensions.... I was either fatigued or going back to the plane....
The fact is if you are fatigued, do the right thing and remove yourself from duty. Let the PTO/Company Paid issue go to the Fatigue committee. Don't do something illegal (affirm fit for duty) due to a concern over PTO.
I've yet to take an extension. And it was my decision to make at my company.
Interesting scenario though Spice. Hmm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here was a recent "unforeseen" delay...
We were about ready to push and I called clearance to give them a heads up to start working on a release time to our destination airport. They came back and said that the destination airport had issued a ground stop due to weather and it would be in effect for 90 minutes.
We had already accepted a 2 hour extension and were going to be using the majority of it, but this ground stop would mean that we would land about 75 minutes past the end of our extension. At that point, we were at the gate, the door was open, and the jetbridge was connected. We knew of the delay, and in our opinion, it was no longer "unforeseen". We could clearly see that if we pushed, we would land well after our extension ran out.
The company's version of unforeseen and ours is evidently very different, as they said to just ignore the ground stop and push...thus making any further delays unforeseen and we could complete the trip.
And I will add document everything that happens. Where I work there is a rather onerous report that has be be filled out that includes a sleep matrix. Some guys would rather just call in sick than play the game. Follow the contract. If it's a hotel noise issue ask for another room and if you still can't sleep then get a name and statement from the front desk about the construction. Just happened to me in OAK a few months ago. When the FAT call goes to the committee I see it like being in court. The better case you make the better chance you have to win.
@Autothrust Blue et al... Read more carefully... You can concur all you want as the CA, but when you refuse an extension the refusal does not apply to the FO.
Et al: stop thinking of extension refusals purely for fatigue.