av8tr1
"Never tell me the odds!"
You have some good points. What does and doesn't constitute a "satisfactory" argument to a philosophical problem is largely subjective, so I'm okay saying that whether certain answers are good enough is my personal opinion. However, some arguments are far better than others.
2) The main thing I was getting at here is the conclusion that people aren't responsible for their own actions, and do not have free will.
3) See above
4) I think you are saying it may not be clear what a moral authority would tell you to do in all circumstances, and I certainly don't disagree. This doesn't diminish the importance of that authority existing, however, imho.
5) Intellectual honesty requires that we recognize some questions don't have conclusive, readily available answers. I have found some to be far more compelling than others.
6) Books have been written about design features that count be accounted for by chance. You may have a different opinion, but I think this is one of most insurmountable problems of atheism.
7) C'mon, man, it was low hanging fruit! And @av8tr1 needed to win his bet!
TL;DR like all other religions, atheism has problems that a rational person should acknowledge.
Some of them are so serious that I cannot accept them. I'll try not to name-call those who do.
Naw, I lost. I had ATN in the 12th. No one could have predicted this thread would go for 19 pages. Although technically we left the original topic back on page 2 and haven’t been back since.
However I think the real outcome of “the dark side of the pilot shortage” is “Don’t take life advice from pilots”