Teaching Things The Right Way
- Thread starter mtsu_av8er
- Start date
deserteaglle
New Member
Dugie8 said:
I meant the actual BOTTOM of the runway...as in below the ground...as in ridiculous to even think of, but it makes my point. For the runway to also exist in a three dimensional world it would also have to have a top(that which is above ground), a bottom(that which is currently beneath the ground), and sides...technically a front and back as well, instead only of a top that has edges at the front, back, and sides.
Imagine a floating brick...except imagine the brick as a runway, and that you are able to land on the bottom of the floating brick/runway.
lol. That is the only way that the runway could be in a three-dimensional world, so that it could be "parallel" to an a/c, directly above the top surface of said floating brick/runway. Got it? :insane: I swear ta gawd I ain' ton any drugs!ahahahahaa.
And Hobbes is a badass...
poppa2trolls
New Member
The world is three dimensional, as is a runway---3 axes... x, y, and z... length, width, and depth.deserteaglle said:
deserteaglle
New Member
Why does everyone want me to be wrong so bad?
Damn, deny, deny. Whatever.:argue:
MidlifeFlyer
Well-Known Member
Just trying to addd some levity to a nasty-sounding thread.deserteaglle said:The plane is in a 3-D world...NOT the runway.
Try landing on the bottom/side of the runway. Good one though, I really thought you had me for a second.
poppa2trolls
New Member
Actually, I was taking your "parallel" discourse as lighthearted repartee. Consequently, I responded in kind---or so I thought. Apologies if I ruffled the eagle's feathers.deserteaglle said:
Why does everyone want me to be wrong so bad?
deserteaglle
New Member
poppa2trolls said:
I gotcha, I thought I was being playful...but also correct in this instance as I had no opinion but only facts...I thought you were serious for a second and my head almost exploded.lol:insane: