AV8RBOY
Well-Known Member
Per AIM 4-2-4 (4):
[Air Taxi of other commercial operators not having FAA authorized call signs should prefix their normal identification with the phonetic word "Tango." Example: Tango Aztec Two Four Six Four Alpha.]
I know of several charter operators in my area that do not use "Tango" with their N-numbers, even though they do not have FAA authorized call signs. Any charter guys/gals out there using "Tango" and know what the big deal is about filing/flying under a "Tango" call sign?
On an associated note... Since the AIM says that "Tango" call signs **SHOULD** be used, but there is not regulation requiring it, it would appear that the use of these call signs is not mandatory. However, it is my understanding that unless there is a compelling reason for non-compliance, anything the AIM says should happen SHOULD happen. I can't imagine a compelling reason not to do this, other than just being too lazy to put a "T" before your N-number on the flight plan. Comments please!
[Air Taxi of other commercial operators not having FAA authorized call signs should prefix their normal identification with the phonetic word "Tango." Example: Tango Aztec Two Four Six Four Alpha.]
I know of several charter operators in my area that do not use "Tango" with their N-numbers, even though they do not have FAA authorized call signs. Any charter guys/gals out there using "Tango" and know what the big deal is about filing/flying under a "Tango" call sign?
On an associated note... Since the AIM says that "Tango" call signs **SHOULD** be used, but there is not regulation requiring it, it would appear that the use of these call signs is not mandatory. However, it is my understanding that unless there is a compelling reason for non-compliance, anything the AIM says should happen SHOULD happen. I can't imagine a compelling reason not to do this, other than just being too lazy to put a "T" before your N-number on the flight plan. Comments please!