Why don't you look it up in the GF Herald?did they finally get rid of that logo/moniker?
Whats your problem?
Interesting, I always said if they change it I am transferring; guess thats just another reason for me to be leaving :insane:
Oh ok, so since 2 out of the 3 tribes voted to keep it and the third tribe, Standing Rock, was in the process of voting on it, you think that they are all offended by it. Lets face it, the State Board of Higher Education, made up of 8 people, decided for everybody. Another prime example of the minority deciding for the majority. There is going to be a sharp decrease in alumni donations. A lot of angry people out there right now.Why is it a shame? This name has been deeply offensive to many Sioux (Dakota, Lakota, and Nakota) people for generations. It promotes stereotyping and reduces a people's heritage to a symbol or mascot. What if it was the Fighting Blacks or the Fighting Germans with a black or German person's head as the logo? Also, why would there even be a struggle to change the name if it were totally innocuous?
Before you say it - I am against "Fighting Irish" and "Washington Redskins" for the same reasons.
Why is it a shame? This name has been deeply offensive to many Sioux (Dakota, Lakota, and Nakota) people for generations. It promotes stereotyping and reduces a people's heritage to a symbol or mascot. What if it was the Fighting Blacks or the Fighting Germans with a black or German person's head as the logo? Also, why would there even be a struggle to change the name if it were totally innocuous?
Before you say it - I am against "Fighting Irish" and "Washington Redskins" for the same reasons.
Why is it a shame? This name has been deeply offensive to many Sioux (Dakota, Lakota, and Nakota) people for generations. It promotes stereotyping and reduces a people's heritage to a symbol or mascot. What if it was the Fighting Blacks or the Fighting Germans with a black or German person's head as the logo? Also, why would there even be a struggle to change the name if it were totally innocuous?
Before you say it - I am against "Fighting Irish" and "Washington Redskins" for the same reasons.
Weren't their people crying over Dickinson's school mascot...what was it, the midgets....:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Why is it a shame? This name has been deeply offensive to many Sioux (Dakota, Lakota, and Nakota) people for generations. It promotes stereotyping and reduces a people's heritage to a symbol or mascot. What if it was the Fighting Blacks or the Fighting Germans with a black or German person's head as the logo? Also, why would there even be a struggle to change the name if it were totally innocuous?
Before you say it - I am against "Fighting Irish" and "Washington Redskins" for the same reasons.