IThe other dumb question is how does the pilot get experienced enough to fly a 200+ pax airliner without being a f/o?
You and I did it, so it must be the way. Belay my last. Carry on...Single pilot freight, duh!![]()
Easy, FSX.It's the old dog and the pilot joke. How much do dogs get paid again?
The other dumb question is how does the pilot get experienced enough to fly a 200+ pax airliner without being a f/o?
You and I did it, so it must be the way. Belay my last. Carry on...![]()
Apparently FedEx has been quietly testing pilotless freight aircraft out over the Pacific to ascertain viability.
I think we'll see pilotless freight operators before single-pilot airliners. Apparently FedEx has been quietly testing pilotless freight aircraft out over the Pacific to ascertain viability.
Wasn't NASA also studying the SATS system a few years ago(Small Air Transport System)? What happened to that project?
So in 10-15 years every airliner out there that requires a 2 person crew (Every RJ, Boeing, Airbus etc) will be sold off, and replaced by an aircraft that is single pilot certified by the FAA that every airline will purchase? If that happens I'll eat my shoes.
So in 10-15 years every airliner out there that requires a 2 person crew (Every RJ, Boeing, Airbus etc) will be sold off, and replaced by an aircraft that is single pilot certified by the FAA that every airline will purchase? If that happens I'll eat my shoes.
Every aircraft type would require STCs and single-pilot specific pilot training/typing. This alone would take years, not to mention union negotiations to amend current CBAs (and yes, I'm aware FEs fought this battle years ago, though that was a systems integration issue, not necessarily CRM-related). The actual mechanical work is just small potatoes. Current industry CRM practices would have to be completely overturned, as well.I have not had any experience in the cockpit of any of the a/c you mention, but I have been invovled in wiring cockpits for a completely new avionics suite and then some. That only took about 5-6 weeks, changing the placement and integration of certain systems will only take some engineering and blue prints in order to configure these A/C single pilot. If that is the case, replacement will not be needed, just a good few weeks to re wire the cockpit and give the PIC(in this case the only pilot on board) access to every switch and knob in the flight deck in order to conduct single pilot ops. Again, not really on board with that as I believe with the practice of good CRM the second pilot is vital to the safety of operations.
This is an elephant in the room for pilots, truck drivers, and anyone else that operates a machine for a living. The technology is there to replace ever last one of us, and economics/capitalism dictate that just that will happen. Enjoy the ride while you can.
This is an elephant in the room for pilots, truck drivers, and anyone else that operates a machine for a living. The technology is there to replace ever last one of us, and economics/capitalism dictate that just that will happen. Enjoy the ride while you can.
Once the price of such sophisticated equipment becomes cheaper than human operators, then yes. Right now, I estimate that technology with all the red tape costs far more than a pilot over the life of an aircraft. Plus you have public acceptance issues, and global interface issues...
Yep, you're deluding yourself if you think it won't. The bush will probably be the last place to lose piloted airplanes, but it'll come there too.
Every aircraft type would require STCs and single-pilot specific pilot training/typing. This alone would take years, not to mention union negotiations to amend current CBAs (and yes, I'm aware FEs fought this battle years ago, though that was a systems integration issue, not necessarily CRM-related). The actual mechanical work is just small potatoes. Current industry CRM practices would have to be completely overturned, as well.