Cheechako
Well-Known Member
I'd probably phrase it as, "Hey, MORON 220 kts!"
Those approaches look like a lot of fun. Especially in a CAT C, or D airplane.
Funny how much a "," [pause] can completely change the meaning of a phrase!
I'd probably phrase it as, "Hey, MORON 220 kts!"
Those approaches look like a lot of fun. Especially in a CAT C, or D airplane.
the lowest rnp value is .1 and the capability to fly certain rnp values is based upon the equipment in the aircraft rather than coverage. rnp procedures really are pretty cool. i design them rather than fly them. if i could, i'd show ya'll some that we're working on that have up to four different routes on the same approach with a bunch of rf legs snaking around.
It has been over a month since someone posted in this thread.
It has been over a month since someone posted in this thread.
And despite that fact, his post actually added some value, unlike yours.
And despite that fact, his post actually added some value, unlike yours.
NiceMy student caught me about a month ago when we were reading the approach brief and it said some junk about RNP .3.
i said, "It has nothing to do with our approach or our airplane and you won't have anything to do with it for quite a while.....and I'll get back to you on what it is when i find out."
....uhhhhh
GPS is a type of RNAV. So is LORAN and INS/IRU.
RNP is a measurement of RNAV tolerances, both in terms of position and percentage of time.
RNAV procedures are predicated on an aircraft meeting a certain level of RNP.