Republic buying Frontier

meyers9163

Well-Known Member
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Frontier-Airlines-lines-up-apf-2124914625.html?x=0&.v=1

Frontier Airlines lines up bankruptcy exit plan
Frontier Airlines to become part of Republic Airways under bankruptcy exit plan
On Monday June 22, 2009, 5:53 pm EDT

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) -- Frontier Airlines appears to have found a way out of bankruptcy protection: Republic Airways Holdings says it will sponsor the bankruptcy exit plan of the Denver-based carrier.

Indianapolis-based Republic says that if creditors and the bankruptcy judge approve, then Frontier would become one of its subsidiaries. Republic also operates a regional airline under its own name as well as Chautauqua Airlines and Shuttle America.

Republic supplied a $40 million debtor-in-possession loan to Frontier so it's not a surprise that it could end up owning the company.

Frontier filed for bankruptcy protection in April 2008.
 
Interestingly enough, this will trigger merger protocols in the RAH contract.

Since most people don't know what that means, probably some studying should be in order.

It could be VERY good to raise the RAH contract to a level it needs to be at.
 
NMB Representation Manual said:
19.0 MERGER PROCEDURES
19.1 Merger
Merger is a consolidation, merger, purchase, lease, operating contract,
acquisition of control, or similar transaction of two or more business
entities.

19.2 Authority
Pursuant to Section 2, Ninth, the NMB, upon an Application, has the
authority to resolve representation disputes arising from a merger
involving a Carrier or Carriers covered by the RLA. The NMB will
consider these representation issues on a case-by-case basis.

19.3 Notice to NMB
A Carrier should notify the NMB, in writing when any of the
transactions described in Section 19.1 occur, or of:
1) an intent to merge, at the same time it files with the Surface
Transportation Board (STB) or the Department of Transportation
(DOT); and
2) a completed merger including the date of the merger and the
Carriers (or business entities) involved.
Notices must comply with the service requirements of Section 1.2.

19.4 Initiation of Procedure for Determination of a Single Transportation
System
Any organization or individual may file an application, supported by
31
evidence of representation or a showing of interest (See Section
19.601-2), seeking a NMB determination that a single transportation
system exists.

19.5 Merger Investigations
After an application is filed, the NMB will conduct a pre-docket
investigation to determine whether a single transportation system
exists. The investigation may take any form appropriate to the
determination.

19.501 Factors Indicating a Single Transportation System
The following are some indicia of a single transportation
system:
(1) published combined schedules or combined routes;
(2) standardized uniforms;
(3) common marketing, markings or insignia;
(4) integrated essential operations such as
scheduling or dispatching;
(5) centralized labor and personnel operations;
(6) combined or common management, corporate
officers, and board of directors;
(7) combined workforce; and,
(8) common or overlapping ownership.

19.6 Procedure After Finding Single Transportation System
If the NMB determines that a single transportation system exists, the
investigation will proceed to address the representation of the proper
craft or class. The rules regarding percentage of valid authorizations in
NMB Rule §1206.2 (29 CFR § 1206.2) and bar rules in NMB Rule
§1206.4 (29 CFR § 1206.4) do not apply to applications filed under this
section.

19.601 Showing of Interest on the Single Transportation System
Incumbent organizations or individuals on the affected carrier(s)
must submit evidence of representation or a showing of interest
from at least thirty-five (35) percent of the employees in the
craft or class. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, a
seniority list, dues check-off list, a current collective bargaining
agreement or a certification, or other indicia of current
representation.

19.602 If the organization or individual filing the application does not
represent any of the employees covered by the application, the
organization or individual must submit authorization cards from
at least thirty-five (35) percent of the employees in the craft or
class. If a single organization or individual represents all of the
employees in a craft or class on the newly created single
transportation system, an application filed by an intervening
organization or individual must be supported by authorization
cards from a majority (more than fifty (50) percent) of the
employees in the craft or class. (See Section 3.601).

19.603 If not already filed with the initial application, organizations
(Incumbents and Intervenors) have fourteen (14) calendar days
from the date of the NMB’s single transportation system
determination to submit evidence of a showing of interest or to
supplement the showing of interest on the single transportation
system.

Applications that do not meet the showing of interest
requirements will be dismissed.
 
RAH CBA Mergers and Successorship said:
H. Successorship and Mergers

1. This Agreement including the rates of pay, rules and working
conditions set forth in this Agreement shall be binding upon any
successor or assign of the Company unless and until changed in
accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended. For purposes of this paragraph, a Successor or assign
shall be defined as an entity which acquires all or substantially all of
the assets or equity of a Company through a single transaction or
multi-step related transaction which closes within a twelve (12)
month period.

2. No contract or other legally binding commitment involving the
transfer of ownership or control pursuant to a Successorship
transaction, whether by sale, transfer or lease of the Company,
Parent or Subsidiary of the Parent, or substantially all of the assets
of any entity, will be signed or otherwise entered into unless it is
agreed as a material and irrevocable condition of entering into,
concluding and implementing such transaction that this Agreement
including the rates of pay, rules and working conditions set forth in
this Agreement will be assumed by the successor employer and
employees on the then current Chautauqua Airlines system
seniority list will be employed in accordance with the provisions of
this Agreement. The Company shall give notice of the existence of
this Agreement to any purchaser, transferee, lessee, or assignee of
the operation covered by this Agreement or any substantial part
thereof. Such notice shall be in writing with a copy to the Union, at
the time the seller, transferor, or lessor executes a definitive
agreement with respect to a transaction as herein described.

3. In the event of a merger of airline operations between the Company
and another air carrier the Company will require, as a condition of
any such operational merger that provisions be included requiring
that the surviving carrier shall provide for fair and equitable
integration of the pre-merger pilots’ seniority lists in accordance
with Articles 3 and 13 of the Allegheny Mohawk LPPs.


4. Integration of the pilot groups shall not occur until the pilot seniority
lists are merged pursuant to procedures as described above.

5. The following additional requirements shall be applicable in the
event of a merger, purchase or acquisition involving the Company,
regardless of the identity of the surviving carrier or whether formerly
separate operations are to be integrated.
a. Unless and until any operational merger is finally
effectuated, the Union will continue to be recognized as the
representative of the pre-merger Company pilots, so long as
such recognition is consistent with the Railway Labor Act
and any applicable rulings or orders of the National
Mediation Board. Recognition of a post-merger
representative shall be governed by the Railway Labor Act
and by any applicable rulings or orders of the National
Mediation Board.
b. Subject to applicable securities and other laws and
regulations, the Company will review with the union the
details of any material agreements relating to Successorship
transactions in a timely manner, provided that no financial or
other confidential business information need be disclosed
unless suitable arrangements are made for protecting the
confidentiality and use of such information.
c. The operations of the Company and those of the other air
carrier shall be kept separate unless and until the processes
described in paragraph b above is completed and the
seniority lists of the two pilot groups are integrated in
accordance with Sections 3 and 13 of the Allegheny-
Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions are completed. During
such time of separate operations, neither aircraft nor pilots
shall be interchanged without the Union’s written consent.
d. Until the processes described in paragraph c above are
completed, no flight deck crew member covered by this
Agreement shall be reduced in status or pay category as an
effect of the merger, purchase or acquisition.
e. During the period of separate operations pilots on the
Chautauqua Pilots System Seniority List prior to the merger,
purchase, or acquisition shall operate all aircraft on hand at
the Company, all aircraft on firm order to the Company and
all aircraft acquired by the Company other than as a result of
the transaction after public announcement of the acquisition
in accordance with this Agreement, provided however that
nothing herein shall be construed to prevent fleet reductions
which are attributable to economic or other reasons and
conditions not related to the transaction, or the retirement of
existing aircraft in the normal course of business.
f. The Company or surviving carrier, if different than the
Company, shall meet promptly with the Union upon request
to negotiate the implementation of the requirements of this
Article.
 
I can't tell if BB is really smart or really stupid.

Not sure. I'm sure he's got some big plan. It'll be interesting to see how the market reacts to the move tomorrow.

I'll tell you what though, he's definitely taken advantage of a docile pilot group. No more than 6 months ago, with my own two ears a CHQ was telling me how they shouldn't ask for more $ in their new contract, better work rules yes, not too much more money though..."Cause the more expensive you are, it's more likely you'll lose flying." Ok...I wonder what this guy thinks now seeing how BB props up failing airlines.
 
The next negotiation meeting his claims of not having enough money to pay you anymore may be true! "Sorry guys, I bought too many airlines!"

RAH - Mokulele, Midwest + Frontier all in 1 year.

Most RAH pilots are great guys/gals but I met a few where I just wanted to slap -- I just hope this small minority doesn't get even more smarmy.
 
Had some Republic FO telling me of this very possibility just the other day. I dismissed it as pure rumor, but apparently not. Sad to see the hometown airline going this way :(
 
The next negotiation meeting his claims of not having enough money to pay you anymore may be true! "Sorry guys, I bought too many airlines!"

RAH - Mokulele, Midwest + Frontier all in 1 year.

Most RAH pilots are great guys/gals but I met a few where I just wanted to slap -- I just hope this small minority doesn't get even more smarmy.
Ive met a few too that i wanted to slap
 
Wow, talk about the tail wagging the dog. A regional swallows up an airline flying bigger equipment. Had a Frontier pilot jumpseater and we were talking about Midwest and RAH only a couple of weeks ago.
 
Back
Top