Yeah, here's the thing. I really enjoyed UND Aerospace, but I know great people from Purdue, Middle Tennessee, Western Michigan, Hillsboro, and Embry Riddle. I also know bad people from Kansas State, Embry Riddle, and well, I just had some bad experiences. Now, does any of that make any school better or worse? Not really, as the biggest thing is what your self drive and value of the experience can give you. My debt from UND has really held back my personal life, even after deploying. Aviation is not a high paying career at the moment and getting that experience for less is really hard. Right now I can't recommend flight school unless you're on the GI Bill or paying for it out of pocket. If you're a certain type of pilot or looking for certain experience then there are pros and cons.
IE:
UND Aerospace, it's cold, but lots of thunderstorms in the summer, great campus, newer aircraft and lots of little airports to practice at with high winds. It'll help you learn uncontrolled airspace flight, very busy towers, various weather, and how to deal with the cold and high crosswinds. However, it's expensive, takes 4.5-5 years reasonably, No-fly November, No-fly March, no mountainous terrain, and a weak career center.
Hillsboro, mountainous, lots of clouds, challenging approaches, small instructor staff, nice aircraft, reasonable cost. The bad, getting a degree can be hit or miss but they have made it a lot better, mountains limit flight paths, and area can be harsh if you're not used to it.
I could go on for all of them. Every school creates awesome and crappy pilots. Some schools may be better at making you an awesome pilot but it really depends on what you're looking for. If you can expand on that then we might be able to help.
-ProudPilot