trickeriche
Well-Known Member
The following question was posed by a fellow CFI this morning and while I don't think any clear answer exists, I would like to hear some opinions.
"Does one need to verify RAIM when executing a non-GPS approach, but utilizing GPS for DME info?"
A scenario being a VOR/DME approach with a non-WAAS GPS providing DME information. The procedure does not have a GPS overlay. GPS database is current.
My thinking was that you would not need RAIM since you are only concerned with a point and three satellites would provide that to a reasonably accurate number. I have already been provided an argument staying that you would need RAIM. An additional scenario is loosing RAIM after the FAF. For a GPS approach, the unit should not flag for 5 mins after the loss of RAIM. If you're flying a non-GPS approach and lose RAIM after the FAF in the previous scenario, would the unit flag immediately or also wait the 5 mins? (This might be a manufacturer question.)
I could continue with more scenarios based on the original, but would like to see what the consensus is.
"Does one need to verify RAIM when executing a non-GPS approach, but utilizing GPS for DME info?"
A scenario being a VOR/DME approach with a non-WAAS GPS providing DME information. The procedure does not have a GPS overlay. GPS database is current.
My thinking was that you would not need RAIM since you are only concerned with a point and three satellites would provide that to a reasonably accurate number. I have already been provided an argument staying that you would need RAIM. An additional scenario is loosing RAIM after the FAF. For a GPS approach, the unit should not flag for 5 mins after the loss of RAIM. If you're flying a non-GPS approach and lose RAIM after the FAF in the previous scenario, would the unit flag immediately or also wait the 5 mins? (This might be a manufacturer question.)
I could continue with more scenarios based on the original, but would like to see what the consensus is.