gay_pilot18
New Member
Okay guys I'm doin a class project. Were supposed to design a new airplane.
It can be an airline type airplane or a military type plane. Well I choose to to create a supersonic air-air to fighter.
My question is this. I was considering putting afterburning " high bypass" engines on my supersonic interceptor.
Now my instructor is kinda strict he doesn't just allow us to just make stuff up.
So would afterburning high bypass engines work out well for a supersonic capable military interceptor, verses low bypass afterburning engines?
If so what would be the major differences (pro's and cons) between the two types high bypass afterburners vs. low bypass afterburners on a supersonic fighter?
And lastly are high bypass afterburing engines even a reality?
Thanks guys in advance.
Everett
It can be an airline type airplane or a military type plane. Well I choose to to create a supersonic air-air to fighter.
My question is this. I was considering putting afterburning " high bypass" engines on my supersonic interceptor.
Now my instructor is kinda strict he doesn't just allow us to just make stuff up.
So would afterburning high bypass engines work out well for a supersonic capable military interceptor, verses low bypass afterburning engines?
If so what would be the major differences (pro's and cons) between the two types high bypass afterburners vs. low bypass afterburners on a supersonic fighter?
And lastly are high bypass afterburing engines even a reality?
Thanks guys in advance.
Everett