Rule 1 of aviation:
Management is scum.
Ehh, I have mixed emotions about this sort of thing. I've only worked for one place where management was essentially scum, and even then, it was only scum by association to bigger scum. Everywhere else that I've worked has had ungodly good people and crews involved in almost all aspects of the job.
That said, management cares about one thing, and one thing only, money. If you keep that in mind, a lot of the decisions that non-pilot management makes become a little bit more clear. They want money, they're not going to jeopardize safety
too much, because that would cause accidents and raise insurance rates. Management wants the level of safety to be just sketchy enough to maximize profits, but just good enough to prevent accidents. That's a balancing act. Many companies go too far towards the "unsafe" side of things, then they make short term gains but fail in the long term. Other companies may stay in business longer but not make nearly the same amount of money that is possible for them to make within the regulatory framework, and may go under after 20 years, and screw lifers.
ACE was a prime example of the middle ground, and they made scads of money. They flew in all weather, with pretty much full planes out of ANC every time, they also had back haul to boot, and they'd go and try the weather when almost everyone else wouldn't. They'd also go to all of the jacked up strips that no one else would take a beech 1900 into, but charge accordingly. They flew their skeleton crew (at least when I was there, I hear things are slower in the recession) of pilots at least 100hrs per month every month with few exceptions, and worked FOs 6 days a week on the low end of the seniority list. The maintenance was exceptional, but they certainly got their mileage out of their ships (with some of the 1900s having more than 50,000hrs on them). The training was great, but it didn't take 6 weeks, was all done in house, and weeded out about 25% of those in ground.