Planes to fly closer together in U.S.


Well-Known Member
Planes to fly closer together in U.S.
FAA rule change consistent with many other areas

WASHINGTON, Oct. 22 — Beginning in January 2005, the government will allow planes to fly closer together at high altitudes to make more routes available.

IN ANNOUNCING the rule change Wednesday, the Federal Aviation Administration said it will make U.S. high-altitude airspace consistent with that over Europe, Australia, Northern Canada and most of the North Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Caribbean and South American countries will join the United States and Southern Canada in implementing the new flight-separation rules, the FAA said.

Planes will be able to fly with at least 1,000 feet between them and planes above or below them when they’re between 29,000 and 41,000 feet. Now the distance must be 2,000 feet.

“This rule offers a combination of greater aviation safety, capacity and cost efficiency,” said FAA Administrator Marion Blakey.

The narrower separations will improve safety by giving controllers more options when rerouting flights around bad weather, the FAA said.

The change also will increase the likelihood that pilots will get permission from controllers to fly at the altitude they want because more options will be available, said William Shumann, FAA spokesman. That’s important for airlines because flying at optimal altitudes saves fuel, their second-highest operating cost. And different planes are more efficient at different altitudes, Shumann said.

The new separation standards will also give pilots more options to fly the route they want because more altitudes will make more lanes available, he said.

Airlines will have to install more accurate altimeters and autopilot systems to fly closer together. The FAA estimates the cost will be $869 million, which will be more than offset by estimated fuel savings of $5.3 billion through 2016.

“A lot of commercial aircraft already have the equipment,” Shumann said.
. . . "The narrower separations will improve safety by giving controllers more options when rerouting flights around bad weather, the FAA said." . . .

Is that really safety or more of a convenience???

I'm not sure if one could say safety is improved by placing large jets flying a couple hundred miles/hour closer together.

While safety may improve for the situation above, it's a give and take situation, and I would argue the greater separation is the greater saftey issue!

Now before anyone might want to jump at me, I'm not saying it shouldn't happen or that it couldn't happen, just questioning it a little.

After all, I'm just a 60 hr PP [SEL] wishing I could flying within 1000 ft of others in an airliner.
Wow, they wrote a whole article about it and managed to not event mention the phrase "DRVSM" ... go nooze!
This has already been in effect in Europe for over a year and a half now. It seems to be working well enough, or else it wouldn't have lasted this long.