PC-12 Rumor

When I was an instructor at FSI, they ran us through a 12 hour short course in the SAAB 2000. It included a short ground school and 12 hrs in the Sim. The whole thing was free.

For the most part the ground school was worthless, as there was too much to cover. If you did not already know how turbine systems generally worked it was almost a complete waste of time. Most of the instructors probably did not get much out of it, other than to realize that they had alot of reading to look foreward to when they got hired somewhere else. The exception was a pretty good class on high altitude physiology and aerodynamics by an old instructor who was ex. RAF.

The Sim was fun, but again we did not spend much time memorizing checklist and 12 hours is not much time. The main benifit was that we were shown how to use the computer trainers for the FMS and could spend as much time as we wanted on them. I got to the point that I was reasonably proficient at this at the time.

I forgot most of what I learned in class, as it was almost 1 year later that I left the academy. Even without spending thousands on a pseudo groundschool and hours of time in a FTD simulating a jet, I was able to pass an initial type rating in a FMS & EFIS equipped jet. Total training time was two weeks, Monday through Saturday, Sunday off, then Monday through Friday with the checkride on Friday. It was not a pleasant experience and I was not sure what would happen until the last few days, when I was starting to feel pretty good about the whole thing.

So, it is possible to pass a groundschool without paying to go through a 'make believe' one first. Just read some books while you are a CFI and you will be ok. There is no time for the instructors to fill any gaps in basic systems knowledge. They only have time for the specific airplane you are learning.

If I could recommend anything it would be to spend some time in something with a good autopilot. The most confusing thing for me was all the different modes of the autopilot and how they would interact with each other.

Now that glass cockpit aircraft are going to become common in the training environment it will also be easier to get an instrument scan going as well. I had never flown glass before and it is alot different. I never really had a good scan in training, but other than steep turns and stalls you can just follow the flight director like a monkey, as long as you make sure the autopilot/flight director is set up properly.

The same thing could be accomplished using MS Flight Sim. You could easily buy one of the add on programs for a jet that includes a working FMS and autopilot along with some decent manuals. I recommended this to my students when I was a CFI but was always too lazy to actually do it myself....

Overall I do not think it is worth the money to go through something like the ACE program (I have heard it cost something like $7k) when you are a student. It will be over a year before you actually go to an airline and you will not remember alot of it unless you continually study and spend time in the sim. After all this you could end up in a different airplane. It may make things a little easier, and learning is never wasted, but the cost is rather steep in my opinion.
 
Ananoman,

Thank you for taking the time to provide some conscientious feedback on this subject... (I had to read through a heap of garbage on this post to find it!)

I am a current PanAm student, and am finishing up my first rating (instrument) there. I do not feel as if my training at PanAm has lived up to my expectations -- nor has my training been commensurate with the very steep prices I'm paying. I am at a crossroads: deciding if the "extras" PanAm offers are adequate reasons to continue my training with them.

I would be very interested in hearing from others with your experience who can offer a **REASONED** response.

Thanks again...
 
[ QUOTE ]
He was from the University of North Dakota and said they were like Harvard.

[/ QUOTE ]

that statement makes most people who actually go to school here laugh :-)
 
Ya know, I hear an awful lot of bickering in these posts. Most of it seems to be centered around one of two things: Either it is about how bad one particular Flight Academy is, or it is about FBO vs Academy. I am sorry folks, I am new to the forum atmosphere and I can't tell you I am very impressed with some of what is said. Many of you claim to be professionals, but I am not so sure. WHO CARES WHERE SOMEONE CHOOSES TO GET THEIR DAMN FLIGHT TRAINING DONE !!!!!!! I understand that some of you feel you are helping new people like myself make an informed decision, and this is true for some of the posts. But lets stop the name calling,bickering and what not. I was in the USAF and I didn't have a choice on who trained me to be an FE, it was all done by Flight Safety International. My point here is that it is ok to give people tidbits of advice based on your own experience, after all that is what these forums are for. But you run into a problem when you try to tell somebody else they are wrong for making the choice to spend THEIR OWN money the way they choose. For you ACADEMY guys, I think it is great you chose the Academy route, that is the way I am probably going to choose, but stop putting down FBO training as if it is crap, and you are some sort of GOD. Believe me when I tell you, that when I was trained to be an FE by Flight Safety, I didn't know everything and still had to go through USAF upgrade OJT afterwards. I am choosing the academy route because I like a structured environment and I am willing to pay for it ! I also like the fact that in an Academy atmosphere I will have little distractions. However I got my PPL from an FBO environment and learned ALOT from instructors who have dedicated their life to teaching. Realize you ACADEMY Guys that some Professional Pilots are instructors for life because that is what they wanted to do. Not every ProPilot is an AIRLINE PILOT !! And as for the PRO FBO GUYS, stop bagging on academys. You guys are famous for saying that the airlines don't give a hoot where you get your ratings, well take some of your own words ok. I understand what you are saying when you talk about glossy magazine ads suckering some poor smuck into buying there program. This is one of the main reasons I will probably attend Flight Safety Academy, because I don't here any fake promises or see any glitzy ads.(even thought that doesn't make an academy a bad choice). But please realize that weather you are an FBO or an ACADEMY they are both a business, and I have seen just as many FBOs pull some quick ones on students too. So please heed your own words. I know this is getting long, but I am just tired of hearing it. Can we get some helpful info out of you people or what. And on a side note, I have a suggestion for the PAN AM forum....this forum has got to be the most hateful forum on JC. You PAN AM guys on here that are instructors, have definately swayed me from attending PAIFA. And no, I am not siding with MAV either. I just think that you guys could handle yourselves a little more professionally when dealing with him and the other people you call names (WHINERS, MORONS, BASHERS etc...) If you want to defend your school, go ahead, but do it constructively and don't resort to name calling, because it makes the decision for guys like me way too easy. And MAV, I think you have a legit gripe, but I don't know the whole story. PanAm defenders, it is great to love your school, but it doesn't look good to a prospective student when you bash a former student that for all I know may have a legitmate gripe. And by the way, if he is lying then why does the Better Business Bureau of South Eastern Florida list that PANAM is not in good standing due to to unanswered complaints. Not saying PANAM hasn't improved, don't care. Because I did not make my decision not to attend there on the basis of MAVs story. I made my decision based on your responses to him !! Any way nuff said, I hope I did not offend anyone and if I did you probably have a guilty conscience. Well just some perspective from a newbie around here. Take care all

P.S. I do not care WHERE YOU TRAIN, if you have a poor ATTITUDE, MURPHY is going to get you sooner or later !
wink.gif


nana2.gif


P.S.S. Doug, you have a great website here and I am not bashing you or the site, I just think from a new persons perspective, even though I have been in and around aviation for 10 years, this particular forum (PANAM) needs some help. I know that everybody doesn't agree, but I came to this site for advice, and some of these characters aren't offering advice, they are acting like little children. But any way great site, lots of good stuff otherwise, keep up the good work !
cool.gif
 
"WHO CARES WHERE SOMEONE CHOOSES TO GET THEIR DAMN FLIGHT TRAINING DONE !!!!!!!"

For the most part, I would agree with you. I'm a die hard supporter of part 61 schools but if someone has chosen the academy route, it's fine by me. My main concern is the lack of honor in advertising. It's not just what the ads say, which can stretch the truth, but the way they make this profession look sooooo easy and appealing. I like my job but it's far from an easy career....and that's coming from a pretty successful major airline pilot.

Where I disagree with you is when it comes to PFT schools like Tab and Gulfstream. These places actually lower the bar of the profession by selling a seat should be someones job. I DO care about what these sort of practices do to the industry and you won't be seeing me shut up about it.
 
Hi again all,

Don't worry this one won't be as long !! I did not want to step on anyones toes, I was more or less asking folks to be constructive in their posts. After all we are all pilots or prospective pilots. We should be on one anothers side, thats all. Like I said, I have gained alot of good info here at JC.

727--Much RESPECT man, I hope things are going well for you in your career, I only hope to be as successfull ! I TOTALLY AGREE with you on Tab etc... I checked them out and was not too impressed with all the glitter and hype. I also saw that they are delving into starting their own airline now LOL. For the most part, I have no prob with guys like yourself, who are offering helpful advice. My problem was only with the name calling and generalizing done by some others. Thanks for the reply GOOD STUFF !!
cool.gif


LIMA CHARLIE -- Much RESPECT to you as well, it is good to hear encouraging words from a PANAM GUY, that is exactly what I was talking about. (PROFESSIONALISM) If you are not a PANAM guy sorry, I thought you were. But either way I appreciate your encouragement. I haven't made my complete decision yet, but more than likely it will be FSA. I have done MUCHO research and they seem to be the best fit for ME. Others might choose differently and that is OK. Once again, thanks, and stay cool !!

nana2.gif



And to finish, for those of you that understand where I was coming from I appreciate your open minds. To those who don't I can't help ya there. GOOD LUCK TO ALL in your careers and or training. Thanks for the opportunity to speak my mind !!
bandit.gif
 
Re: BBB

[ QUOTE ]
. And by the way, if he is lying then why does the Better Business Bureau of South Eastern Florida list that PANAM is not in good standing due to to unanswered complaints.

[/ QUOTE ]

I did a little looking into this BBB thing and here is what I found out. There are 3 BBB "files"listed on the BBB site. Two say that Pan Am is in good standing. The other listing is actually from 1989, and involves our SimCom (simulator training center for airline training) location in Miami, not our Career Pilot development in Ft. Pierce or Phoenix. Here is the link to the "unsat" file from the BBB...
Pan Am BBB Link

Hope this clears up any misunderstanding regarding the BBB.

LC
 
Re: BBB

[ QUOTE ]
Actually if you click on the link for Ft. Pierce, it brings up the same unsat record.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm... Are you sure?? I just looked at the BBB site again, and looked at the Orlando, FL listing, and it came up as "Satisfactory"...

I am getting 3 listings. The one for Phoenix is Satisfactory. The one for Orlando is Satisifactory. The one for the SimCom center in Miami is the one that is Unsat.

Here is the link that I opened for the Orlando listing... Orlando BBB link

Is this one the same one that you are looking at? If not, please post the link to the page you are referring to.
 
Re: BBB

The original one you posted includes the Ft. Pierce center. It is listed as another address..
 
Re: BBB

[ QUOTE ]
The original one you posted includes the Ft. Pierce center. It is listed as another address..

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not 100% sure, but I believe that they are just listing all of the known addresses that are "associated" w/ that center. I don't think it means that every address on the list is rated as "unsatisfactory", just the main address listed at the top of the page. I am pretty sure the complaint is just against the Miami location.
 
Back
Top