Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
And no offense, but the biggest offender of seniority abrogation -and something pilots at my shop apparently want - a base swap.
This is when two mutual pilots of same fleet/seat decide to mutually swap. Problem is, there could be a more junior vs senior base (eg, VX and the NYC base) where one would never be able to hold it normally, but due to a swap outside of a vacancy bid award, now trades with another pilot and wins this base. Say a senior guy commutes and doesn’t care if he’s SFO or LAX. And assume I get displaced to SFO in the upcoming displacement. What’s to stop me to make a deal with that guy and ask him if he’s cool leaving SFO and bid LAX, and once I get forced to SFO, then base swap with him afterwards and he gets his original SFO back and I get my original LAX back - a base I couldn’t hold after the Airbus LAX closure.
How does that make sense? That’s not seniority abrogation? Getting a base that otherwise you would never have held in a vacancy award process?
This is when two mutual pilots of same fleet/seat decide to mutually swap. Problem is, there could be a more junior vs senior base (eg, VX and the NYC base) where one would never be able to hold it normally, but due to a swap outside of a vacancy bid award, now trades with another pilot and wins this base. Say a senior guy commutes and doesn’t care if he’s SFO or LAX. And assume I get displaced to SFO in the upcoming displacement. What’s to stop me to make a deal with that guy and ask him if he’s cool leaving SFO and bid LAX, and once I get forced to SFO, then base swap with him afterwards and he gets his original SFO back and I get my original LAX back - a base I couldn’t hold after the Airbus LAX closure.
How does that make sense? That’s not seniority abrogation? Getting a base that otherwise you would never have held in a vacancy award process?