I don't disagree with people, even O'Reilly, questioning the possible connection between the crash, and what happened with the stalls just a couple of days prior. However, O'Reilly seems already convinced that there is a cover-up, without any facts to back it up. There are facts to say there isn't a connection; those, which he will ignore. Notice, it seemed, a few times, he'd ask a question, such as, "is 48 hrs enough time to do an inspection", then move to something else, quickly, not giving the "expert" a chance to answer. In other words, he asked a question, he hoped would be rhetorical, and people would formulate, on their own, that 48 hrs is not enough time, while not giving the "expert" a chance to say, yes, in fact, it is.