[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What do you all think about the, for lack of a better twrm, "pickle" that ALPA gets in when it represents the interests of both mainline and regional pilot groups? In the sense that it's nearly impossible to please both?
[/ QUOTE ]
It's called a conflict of interest and is the foundation of the RJDC's lawsuit against ALPA.
http://www.rjdefense.com/
[/ QUOTE ]
Interesting. I'll look into that more. The reason I ask is that I've wondered how ALPA can do this type of representation.
For instance:
At AMR. American is represented by APA, American Eagle is ALPA. So you have ALPA supposedly fighting for the regional rights here.
But what about where ALPA represents the mainline and the regional (Continental, maybe?). It just seems an interesting position they put themselves in. Do this for mainline and not for regional, or vice versa. Is ALPA national's officers primarily mainline personnel, or a combination of mainline and regional? How to resolve this kind of pickle? Did scope begin this pickle problem or have any part in it?
[legit questions by me since my familiarity and knowlege of the union practices isn't, admittedly, all that up to speed]
[ QUOTE ]
What do you all think about the, for lack of a better twrm, "pickle" that ALPA gets in when it represents the interests of both mainline and regional pilot groups? In the sense that it's nearly impossible to please both?
[/ QUOTE ]
It's called a conflict of interest and is the foundation of the RJDC's lawsuit against ALPA.
http://www.rjdefense.com/
[/ QUOTE ]
Interesting. I'll look into that more. The reason I ask is that I've wondered how ALPA can do this type of representation.
For instance:
At AMR. American is represented by APA, American Eagle is ALPA. So you have ALPA supposedly fighting for the regional rights here.
But what about where ALPA represents the mainline and the regional (Continental, maybe?). It just seems an interesting position they put themselves in. Do this for mainline and not for regional, or vice versa. Is ALPA national's officers primarily mainline personnel, or a combination of mainline and regional? How to resolve this kind of pickle? Did scope begin this pickle problem or have any part in it?
[legit questions by me since my familiarity and knowlege of the union practices isn't, admittedly, all that up to speed]