ClearedForOption
Displaced... again.
I know there's a thread about this buried back in Feb.
But, I don't think that it's been mentioned in awhile and there's only 3 days left to comment on the FAA's ANPRM.
So, if you haven't already... click on the link at the bottom and take the time to chime in and let the feds know what you think about the proposed rule changes... If all they get are comments from kids at 'The Harvard of the Skies' or Roger Cohen's cronies then, well, all they will see is that there isn't a problem with the current regs and requirements and we can continue to sail on with the status quo. (and we all know where that has got us)
The gov't is the people and change begins with us... don't think that someone else will pipe in for you. If you haven't done so, take the time and make a comment. (especially questions 1 and 2)
Anyhoo... who knows if this whole process is still a going concern with the recent bills that passed the House and Senate, but I figured I would throw it out there.
Here's the summary:
But, I don't think that it's been mentioned in awhile and there's only 3 days left to comment on the FAA's ANPRM.
So, if you haven't already... click on the link at the bottom and take the time to chime in and let the feds know what you think about the proposed rule changes... If all they get are comments from kids at 'The Harvard of the Skies' or Roger Cohen's cronies then, well, all they will see is that there isn't a problem with the current regs and requirements and we can continue to sail on with the status quo. (and we all know where that has got us)
The gov't is the people and change begins with us... don't think that someone else will pipe in for you. If you haven't done so, take the time and make a comment. (especially questions 1 and 2)
Anyhoo... who knows if this whole process is still a going concern with the recent bills that passed the House and Senate, but I figured I would throw it out there.
Here's the summary:
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a8faebFederal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61 and 121
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0100; Notice No. 10-02]
RIN 2120-AJ67
New Pilot Certification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This advance notice of proposed rulemaking requests public comment on possible changes to regulations relating to the certification of pilots conducting domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. The purpose of this notice is to gather information on whether current eligibility, training, and qualification requirements for commercial pilot certification are adequate for engaging in such operations. The FAA may use this information to determine the necessity of establishing additional pilot certification requirements and to determine what those new requirements might include.
DATES: Send your comments on or before April 9, 2010.
Questions:
1A. Should the FAA require all pilot crewmembers engaged in part 121 air carrier operations to hold an ATP certificate? Why or why not?
1B. If a part 121 air carrier pilot does not hold an ATP certificate, should he or she nevertheless be required to meet the ATP certificate aeronautical knowledge and experience requirements of Sec. 61.159, even if he or she is serving as SIC? Why or why not?
2A. Are aviation/pilot graduates from accredited aviation university degree programs likely to have a more solid academic knowledge base than other pilots hired for air carrier operations? Why or why not?
2B. Should the FAA consider crediting specific academic study in lieu of flight hour requirements? If so, what kind of academic study should the FAA accept, and to what extent should academic study (e.g., possession of an aviation degree from an accredited four-year aviation program) substitute for flight hours or types of operating experience?
2C. If the FAA were to credit academic study (e.g., possession of an aviation degree from an accredited four-year aviation program and/or completion of specific courses), should the agency still require a minimum number of flight hours for part 121 air carrier operations?
Some have suggested that, regardless of academic training, the FAA should require a minimum of 750 hours for a commercial pilot to serve as SIC in part 121 operations. Is this number too high, or too low, and why?
3A. Should the FAA propose a new commercial pilot certificate endorsement that would be required for a pilot to serve as a required pilot in part 121 air carrier operations? Why or why not?
3B. If so, what kinds of specific ground and flight training should the endorsement include?
3C. The FAA expects that a new endorsement would include additional flight hour requirements. At a minimum, the FAA requests comments on how many hours should be required beyond the minimum hours needed to qualify for a commercial pilot certificate. Some have suggested that the FAA require a minimum of 750 hours for a commercial pilot to serve as SIC in part 121 operations. Is this number too high, or too low, and why?
3D. The FAA is considering proposing to require operating experience in a crew environment, in icing conditions, and at high altitude operations. What additional types of operating experience should an endorsement require?
3E. Should the FAA credit academic training (e.g., a university-awarded aviation degree) toward such an endorsement and, if so, how might the credit be awarded against flight time or operating experience?
4A. Would a carrier-specific additional authorization on an existing pilot certificate improve the safety of part 121 operations? Why or why not?
4B. Should the authorization apply only to a pilot who holds a commercial certificate, or should it also apply to the holder of an ATP certificate?
4C. Should such an authorization require a minimum number of flight
hours? If so, how many hours should be required?
5A. Can existing monitoring, evaluation, information collection requirements, and enforcement associated with pilot performance be modified to improve pilot performance?
5B. If so, what specific modifications should be considered?