New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight Acad.

Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
BTW, is there a dog and pony show coming to Portland anytime soon?

I'd like to attend one posing as "the uninformed newbie" to see what marketing reeeaallly says.

I better change the ol Avatar though.


(I just 'loved' the DCA one back in Seattle a couple years ago, hahaha)

[/ QUOTE ]

More power to ya... You would have to check the website for the upcoming cities... You and DE727 could go together!!!
nana2.gif
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't say you carry baggge around.

What i mean is baggage = management, scheduling issues, politics (i.e lucrative foreign airlines training contracts)

Face it most academies are pretty dang top heavy with management and their fun rules and procedures.

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't had a problem w/ any of the "baggage" that you list.

I will agree, that in the past, Pan Am has been top heavy. At some point along the line, the "powers that be" lost track of who their customer is, and how valuable that customer really is. Decisions were made that put the emphasis on the $$$ rather than the people. As a result, the MavMB's of the world were born. Fortunately, with some change on the administrative level, those "powers" have seen the light. They are being proactive in fixing the "issues" that have plagued Pan Am. I, for one, am looking forward to the new, FLEXIBLE, Pan Am!!
nana2.gif
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Obviously Lima Charlie is satisfied with his experience at Pan Am, and that's great. He was helpful to me when I was in the process of selecting a flight school, and I feel he was very forthcoming in talking to me about the positives and negatives of his training. In fact, Pan Am does offer a very streamlined training system, and anyone interest in taking the "fast track" (if there is such a thing) should consider it.

My training at Pan Am, however, failed to live up to my expectations, and I left the school after completing only one rating. While I do not feel that Pan Am necessarily misrepresented their product, I do feel that in my case the training I received was not up to par with the very steep prices I was paying. This was due, in my perception, to the "baggage" that comes with operating a large academy.

Let's face it, operating a large school requires a lot of resources; i.e., staff, facilities, etc. It also requires standardization for efficiency--in the form of a cookie-cutter syllabus. While the school's facilities and aircraft are great for the students, the syllabus is not. No two students learn the same way, and as a result a syllabus that cannot be molded to the individual can only lead to frustration by both the instructor and the student. Lima Charlie states that "in the past, Pan Am has been top heavy." I would argue that it still is today.

The school is top heavy with significant overhead that affects the entire training process in negative ways: The outrageous prices, the syllabus, the school's scheduling practices. While the school claims that all of this is necessary to prepare its students for an airline career--the real reason for any of it that it is easier for the school than adopting the alternatives which would really put the student first.

So, are the "issues" at Pan Am really fixed? If they were, I doubt three fellow Pan Amers from my class would be joining me at my new school. And, from what I hear, the they are just a few of those that got out while they could--meaning, quite literally, while they still had some money available for training.

You may be wondering why, considering my experience I would recommend prospective aviation students consider Pan Am. The reason is simply as I previously stated: “No two students learn the same.” What Pan Am offers in abundance is structure and discipline. For a certain type of personality—one that thrives in such an environment—Pan Am is an ideal place. It is really up to the student to decide, then, if having that kind of environment is worth suffering the consequences inherent in the nature of the academy. For some, truly, I believe it is.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

I think people forget (or probably didn't know) that I did a positive review of Pan Am back in July 2001.

In 2001, the website was a lot quieter and I had the ability to slip in as a starry-eyed potential student, ask questions and more or less ask things that I already knew the answers to and see what their approach was going to be. It was pretty fun in those days because I was just some guy in shorts, flip flops and a t-shirt asking pointed questions but I really don't have that amount of anonymity that I used to.

About a year later, the pendulum swung and some people were having issues with PAIFA where I decided to remove my endorsement in mid-2002. Remember the flight school reviews section of the website? It's still there, I can reactivate it and show you the review.

Over the past year, from current students and graduates, I got the impression that they had gotten their crap together, took notice of what was being said on the internet and made appropriate changes to the operation.

If those changes weren't made and I didn't get a 'warm fuzzy' that they made corrections, I certainly wouldn't have spent all of the time reviewing information, talking to students recently familiar with the program and accepting advertising. If you've got recent experience with the program and haven't spoken to me, I've got a very public email address, talk to me.

The second the site loses credibility, I might as well sell it to Kit Darby and retire altogether from running Jetcareers.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Dan... Mucho props to you!! I appreciate you for being level headed about your experience. Since we had spoken before your enrollment, I wish we would have connected while you were here. Maybe we could have figured out how to get you the help you needed. Our loss... :-( Anyway, you are 100% right when you say that everyone learns in a different ways. And that fact alone is a HUGE challenge for a school this size. Eventhough I am glad that you found a "home" at another school, I think you would be pleasantly surprised by what changes are coming down the pipe. As I mentioned in a previous post, much more attention is being put on how the students are doing and making sure the school is delivering what they promise. Good luck, and don't be a stranger!!

LC
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Doug,


Thanks for the reply man. I, and I'm sure many others, appreciate you explaining yourself a little more fully. Like I said to you in Vegas, your screening of flight schools makes my life easier in that I don't have to scour the earth trying to figure out which flight schools will rip me off and which ones won't. With that, I've chosen to narrow my flight school choices to those that you will accept advertising from as I know you're not a guy to let people get ripped off. Furthermore, I'd like to spend my money at a place that supports the continuation of this site and forum. Quite honestly, I never remember seeing positive anything about PanAm, but I showed up here in early/mid 2002 so I never quite had the chance to.

Cheers


John Herreshoff
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

And it's an ongoing process. I can only do so much research, but I totally and completely rely on feedback that I get in email. Forums are only one source -- but most of the feedback I get about certain flight schools are thru jetcareers email because the positives don't want to get flamed, and the negatives don't want to burn bridges.

I'll be completely frank, I'm a small flight school/FBO type of guy having been thru a gigantic program like ERAU. But if you're specifically looking for an academy-style education, I can suggest certain institutions as well.

Pan Am does have a PR problem and I think they're trying to correct that.

But if the last few months have been a big dog and pony show, well, the health of the website far outweighs advertising commitments.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Who's working on their banner? I haven't seen a Pan-Am banner yet.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

dimension problems so they weren't proprogating correctly! The ad server software is very particular when it comes to ad dimensions.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
I think people forget (or probably didn't know) that I did a positive review of Pan Am back in July 2001.

In 2001, the website was a lot quieter and I had the ability to slip in as a starry-eyed potential student, ask questions and more or less ask things that I already knew the answers to and see what their approach was going to be. It was pretty fun in those days because I was just some guy in shorts, flip flops and a t-shirt asking pointed questions but I really don't have that amount of anonymity that I used to.

About a year later, the pendulum swung and some people were having issues with PAIFA where I decided to remove my endorsement in mid-2002. Remember the flight school reviews section of the website? It's still there, I can reactivate it and show you the review.

Over the past year, from current students and graduates, I got the impression that they had gotten their crap together, took notice of what was being said on the internet and made appropriate changes to the operation.

If those changes weren't made and I didn't get a 'warm fuzzy' that they made corrections, I certainly wouldn't have spent all of the time reviewing information, talking to students recently familiar with the program and accepting advertising. If you've got recent experience with the program and haven't spoken to me, I've got a very public email address, talk to me.

The second the site loses credibility, I might as well sell it to Kit Darby and retire altogether from running Jetcareers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Doug, how can you get an honest opinion of a flight school from going there once? I don't care who advertises on your site but maybe we should talk about Pan Am's 2000 dollar penalty charge and the $7000 dollar ace program that wastes students money.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
...you're serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

Me and John finally agree on something! Doug, you never went to this school. You don't know what these academies are really like. Pretty soon we will be advertising for ATA too. Oh well, so does AOPA; just part of the aviation world.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
Pretty soon we will be advertising for ATA too. Oh well, so does AOPA

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean like American Trans Air or are you referring to Tab Express? I'm pretty sure there'd be some pretty ticked off people here to learn ATA is still operating as a flight school.

As far as Pan Am goes, since the banner ad no longer says "gauranteed" on it, I'm cool with it. There's plenty of people out there with gripes against FSI, ATP and Ari-Ben. I'm sure there's people out there that hate Air Orlando and FBOs too.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]

Doug, how can you get an honest opinion of a flight school from going there once? I don't care who advertises on your site but maybe we should talk about Pan Am's 2000 dollar penalty charge and the $7000 dollar ace program that wastes students money.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG!!! Are we really going to resurrect this DEAD horse!!!
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Doug, how can you get an honest opinion of a flight school from going there once? I don't care who advertises on your site but maybe we should talk about Pan Am's 2000 dollar penalty charge and the $7000 dollar ace program that wastes students money.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG!!! Are we really going to resurrect this DEAD horse!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

"I'm not quite dead yet!"
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Geez, well fine, here we go.

There are a thousand ways to 'skin a cat' in the aviation world.

There are large FBO's, small "mom&pop" schools, flight academies, collegiate aviation, the military, etc.

Which way is the best way? Personally, I think the US military "Undergraduate Pilot Training" because the price is right and you're going to fly way cooler things than you'll ever have a chance to in the civilian sector. Plus, you'll be a 'known quantity' candidate and you can pretty much write your own ticket in the aviation world when there's hiring going on.

It depends on the student. Some students will thrive in a small FBO environment, some other students have the resources and desire to go to a flight academy.

Which is better?

Neither.

Flight academies are a lot of money, FBO's have far lower costs and lower prices. Some flight academies offer CL-65 prep... You don't need it, the airlines don't require it, but if it's something you're interested in and want to do, go for it if you've got the financial resources. The multi-engine rating I earned at ERAU was the same multi-engine rating that I could have earned at Falcon Air for a lot less.

However both environments offer different tools to different students.

A couple examples. I'm a big fan of ATP, but ATP isn't for a casual student who likes to be spoonfed and coddled like a child. The student has to arrive prepared, motivated and ready to learn or they're going to whip his ass and then he's going to show up on the forum later complaining about he got cheated out of two extra hours of extra training in the Seminole where in fact he came to training flights unprepared on several occasions.

I'm a 5-year ERAU grad. It was a lot of money, I spent a lot of time and cash doing things that amounted to more or less dumping hoardes of cash into a roaring fire.

Would I go to ERAU again? No, but considering the networking contacts, the people I met and friends that I made, I'd certainly at least hang out there on the weekends and sponge sponge sponge.

If I had stayed in Tulare and trained at the (now defunct) Gryphon School of Aviation (where I got my private), I wouldn't have met Mike Lewis/Copaman, MikeD, Joe E (not a member of the website), Bogberto, Craig Funk, Art Draut, Fred Cone, etc -- all of the people that helped me get to where I am today in their own ways.

Yeah, I complained about Riddle, spoke of the Riddle run-a-round, and I still do, but I still stayed. Looking back, considering I was pretty wet behind the ears and largely immature, it actually worked for me. I didn't have the support network that you guys enjoy. My only contact with an actual pilot was my high school counselor's husband who was an out of work four-timed furloughed Inland Empire Airlines metroliner FO who more or less told me to "...run, don't walk, away from this field, but I can answer a couple of questions".

So knowing what I know now, would I go back to ERAU? No.

But would I be where I am today not meeting the aforementioned people? Probably not.

Catch-22.

Ok, I went off on a tangent, but it works like this.

Whenever someone wants to run advertising on jetcareers, I do a lot of digging. I read the negative, the positive, read thru syllabuses and realize that a single bad advertiser can torpedo the entire effort here at Jetcareers. It's a pretty slow process and most potential advertisers get pissed and tell me to go to hell because they wanted exposure, not the Spanish Inquisition, but that's the way I do things around here.

For every one advertiser you see, there might be five others that balked at my advertising fees or told me to go to hell what I told them what I needed to evaluate their institution.

What you actually see on the forum might be, at most, perhaps 40% of the actual correspondence that goes on behind the scenes.

Certain students are going to thrive in a university program, certain students will do best in a small FBO, other students will do best in a university environment, but I'd probably send my own kid to speak to a ANG liason officer to talk about flying C-130's or F-16's in the guard, or a small local FBO after college because he's already got a built-in support/mentoring network in dad and his croanies.

Flight training is 'transporation' of sorts.

There are Hondas and Acuras.

They're both cars. They'll both drive 65 mph on highway 101 with safety, efficiency and comfort.

Some folks might want leather seats.

Some folks might want cloth seats.

Acuras have some built-in features that Hondas drivers don't see or have a need for. Is the Acura a waste of money? Maybe, maybe not. Both brands have what you need however, the brands present a different product.

I live in Arizona. I may not need the heated leather seats that come standard in the Acura, but the Acura driver who spent more for the heated leather seats isn't necessarily a dumbass, especially if he lives in Michigan.

And the "ATA" comment, Mike, come on bro, you drank beer and broke bread in my home on numerous occasions, you know damned well that's an ill statement and you already know the philosophies on which I build and grow Jetcareers.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

"not the Spanish Inquisition,"

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.....
(that's a monty python quote from a skit)

I went to ERAU as well and wouldn't do it again. The difference between your experience and mine was I had NO networking benefit from being there. I honestly think I'd done better had I stayed at the local FBO longer as it grew into a very successful 135 Lear operation. But....as you say....there are many ways to skin a cat.

My main objection to PanAm is their marketing, just like DCA. It's a big deal to me, as everyone knows, but corporate truth in advertising is lacking at some of these big academies. Everyone says you should know what you're getting into when you enter this career, no matter what the ads say. I guess I hold flight schools to a higher standard than used car dealers....some say I shouldn't.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Doug, how can you get an honest opinion of a flight school from going there once? I don't care who advertises on your site but maybe we should talk about Pan Am's 2000 dollar penalty charge and the $7000 dollar ace program that wastes students money.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG!!! Are we really going to resurrect this DEAD horse!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

"I'm not quite dead yet!"

[/ QUOTE ]

"But you will be soon!"
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

Well I apologize to Doug for the ATA qoute. As long as we are allowed to say postive and negatives about the advertisers that is the important thing. I just don't feel that a lot of kids that sign up up for the academies have all the facts before they do so. And I would argue that it takes a much more disciplined student to work at his own pace and do is own studying at an FBO rather than follow a pre-set format at an academy.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

[ QUOTE ]
My main objection to PanAm is their marketing, just like DCA. It's a big deal to me, as everyone knows, but corporate truth in advertising is lacking at some of these big academies.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pan Am passed Doug's semi-incognito sniff test a few years ago, too, so I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

As for the advertising you find deceptive, if you aren't aware of this, you should be: more often than not, ads are written by copywriters with only the barest grasp of what they're trying to market. It's not like you're going to find many ad people with a commercial ticket and 3000 hours under their belt and able to separate the bull from the [censored]. And the thing is, most small business operators aren't savvy enough themselves to be critical of what's being said. They're usually too busy saying "oooh, full-color... prettttyyyy!".

So who do you blame? Pan Am's marketing director and their ad agency.
 
Re: New Advertiser: Pan Am International Flight A

"As for the advertising you find deceptive, if you aren't aware of this, you should be: more often than not, ads are written by copywriters with only the barest grasp of what they're trying to market."

I was not aware of that, but it sure does show in the sort of things they say.

"So who do you blame? Pan Am's marketing director and their ad agency."

What difference does it make?
 
Back
Top