it was discussed in here earlier, unusable fuel is, unusable.
That’s a fair scenario. Anyone know the avionics they are running these? Garmin is reliant on FOB sync but you can force a number you think is in there without it being accurate.
If the difference between fms fuel calculation and measured fuel is greater than 400lbs you get a message on the fms for miscompare.If you manually enter a fuel value and never sync it with the actual FOB, is there anything that would tell you the numbers don’t match?
Just thinking out loud here, but I could see a scenario where someone manually entered the fuel, never verified it against the actual fuel onboard, and then the briefing only covered predicted landing fuel. If nobody was really looking at the actual starting fuel, I can see how a mistake like that could snowball into a much bigger problem. Total speculation on my part, though.
Only thing I could think of there is a MEL’d fuel gauge as the beginning of the error chain. Not sure what the 680A (and NetJets procedure) allows but the 525B MMEL allows a single gauge to be inop. Pretty strict conditions though and I think at a minimum a massive planning or unit conversion error would have to be stacked on top.If the difference between fms fuel calculation and measured fuel is greater than 400lbs you get a message on the fms for miscompare.
Only thing I could think of there is a MEL’d fuel gauge as the beginning of the error chain. Not sure what the 680A (and NetJets procedure) allows but the 525B MMEL allows a single gauge to be inop. Pretty strict conditions though and I think at a minimum a massive planning or unit conversion error would have to be stacked on top.