National Airlines B747-400 Freighter (BCF) Down in Bagram, Afghanistan

To the best of my recollection, the crash at Mather Field in California (Feb 2000) used turning to change the lift vector and modulated the turn to try to maintain altitude and some control. Ultimately, they were unsuccessful but they did make most of the circuit before crashing.

I don't know what they were using to make their turn with or if they knew they had a disconnected control tab on the DC-8's right elevator in which sealed the fate of this aircraft.
 
I don't know what they were using to make their turn with or if they knew they had a disconnected control tab on the DC-8's right elevator in which sealed the fate of this aircraft.[/quote

One possible scenario here (simply) speculating... in a departure from that field and the steep climb angle required....how would an engine failure factor in to this situation ? (Steep climb angle extra stress on turbines/airframe)? BTW I have never seen a 744 depart with such an extreme deck angle...
 
They'd be conducting tactical departures and approaches at Bagram. Check out Youtube for some footage... it's really fun to watch, as long as things don't go bad.
 
Good to know. If they weren't doing tactical departures, that really underscores how soon they were in trouble.

Someone many posts ago asked about potential survival scenarios, depending on when the CG shift happens. Any one have thoughts on that? I get that once you get into the rotation that it's do or die, but... in that case, it was likely do AND die. Hard to say if putting it back down, dropping anchor, and riding it out would be any more survivable.
 
Chances of survival are probably much higher with sliding it off the end of the runway. Air France in Toronto. American in Mo Bay. Kalitta in Brussels. Just to name a few...
I would think so, especially in that neck of the woods. Hell... might take out a few insurgents in the process. This is assuming, of course, that if in fact this is a CG shift, that the load broke free at or around rotation.
 
It just really depends. If you've rotated, the chances of getting back down on the remaining runway is pretty slim, and you're going to somehow want to get the aircraft stopped on a surface that's not very forgiving.

I don't mean to prejudge the event ahead of the findings of the investigation, but they were dealt an unwinnable hand if the cargo shifted, especially that low.
 
The 74's out of Bagram don't necessarily make what I would call, "tactical" departures. A steeper climb for the first thousand feet? Sure, but nothing like the C-17 in that video. Heck, the C-17's at BAF don't even do that.

As far as the checking of the cargo is concerned, the US cargo companies that fly in and out of Afghanistan have loadmasters. Well, that's what the loadmasters that I work with tell me anyways. Even UPS and FedEx have LM's for their Afghan flights. Don't know if its a DOD requirement or what. Maybe someone here can correct me if I'm wrong on that.
 
The 74's out of Bagram don't necessarily make what I would call, "tactical" departures. A steeper climb for the first thousand feet? Sure, but nothing like the C-17 in that video. Heck, the C-17's at BAF don't even do that.

As far as the checking of the cargo is concerned, the US cargo companies that fly in and out of Afghanistan have loadmasters. Well, that's what the loadmasters that I work with tell me anyways. Even UPS and FedEx have LM's for their Afghan flights. Don't know if its a DOD requirement or what. Maybe someone here can correct me if I'm wrong on that.

When I was at Gemini, that's what the LMs did.
 
As you mentioned ailerons are useless as you approach stall, so how do you roll wings if your ailerons are ineffective?

Others have said the same but it's not necessarily true. My Bellanca has full aileron authority in a stall, even when held in a stall. Can't believe it's the only model of aircraft that does that.
 
Good to know. If they weren't doing tactical departures, that really underscores how soon they were in trouble.

The 74's out of Bagram don't necessarily make what I would call, "tactical" departures. A steeper climb for the first thousand feet? Sure, but nothing like the C-17 in that video. Heck, the C-17's at BAF don't even do that.

There are various procedures for departure to avoid SAFIRE and MANPAD. While operator's procedure (non-military) may not be true tactical departures (due to limitations and capabilities) rest assured we are climbing at Vx for a time to get away from the ground before the fence line.

While we have other means to fend off imminent attack, one of the best is to get off the ground and get high ASAP.

Every night though I do get to watch Tornadoes, Hornets and others perform actual tactical departures and it is very cool. They're at 10,000 agl before the end of the fence line.
 
flew over it yesterday....pretty sobering...all that was left was a portion of the horizontal stab
 
To dog hump on my other comment on this subject, trying to put it back down after takeoff in the remaining runway distance is just not something you do in jets. Even if it is an 11,800' rwy. That is how you die for sure, compared to maybe (or probably in this case) dying by taking it airborne with whatever hand you were dealt.
 
Back
Top