Autothrust Blue
“If you jump on my shift, that’s just rude, man.”
“Okay, Popper, this is how we talk to ramp…”Also sorry military guys, your TT is too low so you’re not competitive anymore.
“Okay, Popper, this is how we talk to ramp…”Also sorry military guys, your TT is too low so you’re not competitive anymore.
you don’t, you read into things beyond conservative twitter and realize its a target FOR THE GRADUATION RATE AT THE COMPANY OWNED FLIGHT SCHOOL.How can you take half of your requirement newhires
“Okay, Popper, this is how we talk to ramp…”
My new hire class at AA a year ago was 37ish people...I think 1 or 2 were not white, 0 females. But you know..."DEI! RABBLE RABBLE!!!"Tell us you got hired at SWA without saying you got hired at SWA.
Since you mentioned “half”, it is easy to infer that you are talking about Scott Kirby. You sound like my 80+ year old father. He has asked me at least a dozen times if United is still using “DEI” for hiring. And every time he asks, I have to tell him that he needs to stop watching Fox News because they are full of •. (Sound familiar?)But that’s the point though.
How can you take half of your requirement newhires, from a group that is only 15% of the entire pilot population? Scenario A
You can easily fill half of your requirement newhires from 85% of the entire pilot pool. Scenario B
In scenario B, you can be selective and weed out many based on failures, past history, etc. But with scenario A, you need to fill half your classes from this group and since it’s only 15% of the pilot population, you have no choice but to take the bottom barrels too.
The math isn’t mathing.
He’s actually talking about himself. Shhh…I'm just so excited to see CCs anecdotal example of somebody who got hired and had 25 extra sims, 150 hours of OE, and has failed every recurrent. All because they were a DEI hire.
Show me where that happens. Give me data.
I mean in general. The standard FAA answer is “certificated and qualified.”
But if you are allowed to take a test unlimited amounts of times, you’re one day going to be certificated and qualified. The CA of Colgan and the FO of Atlas (both PF when the accidents occurred) are a prime example of multiple failures throughout their careers, but passed eventually, and are considered “qualified.”
I can’t have a serious conversation about the various ways I actually DO think the business is blowing it without some knob on EXXXXXXXXXXXXX taking it and running with it as if I agree with whatever hogwash.you don’t, you read into things beyond conservative twitter and realize its a target FOR THE GRADUATION RATE AT THE COMPANY OWNED FLIGHT SCHOOL.
200(?) pilots a year, if they make it through the program, to get into a regional, and god knows how many don’t get dumped out of the program in the subsequent years. And right wing twitter acts like there’s a direct entry captain flow from HBCUs to mainline ground school.
Except airline pilot radio work is occasionally atrocious…anyway I’ll be driving simulated trains wondering why we don’t have more CPDLC capability.Like the old learn a language tapes, listen and repeat…
Pretty sure everyone who has ever crashed a Part 121 airliner was current and qualified in accordance with the Company’s and regulator’s requirements.So is your argument that DPEs/APDs are pushing unqualified applicants though checkrides to feed a made up narrative?
Both examples you gave, those pilots were qualified. You can retrain to standard, and pass the standard..
Welcome to AQP bud!
Note also that Scott Kirby rather transparently goes whichever way the wind is blowing, to an extent beyond most airline CEOs in my view. It may not be the most wholesome way to run a large, publicly traded company, but it is likely the most logical and profitable.Since you mentioned “half”, it is easy to infer that you are talking about Scott Kirby. You sound like my 80+ year old father. He has asked me at least a dozen times if United is still using “DEI” for hiring. And every time he asks, I have to tell him that he needs to stop watching Fox News because they are full of •. (Sound familiar?)
Back to Kirby’s comments. This is what he said:
"Over the next decade, United will train 5,000 pilots who will be guaranteed a job with United, after they complete the requirements of the Aviate program – and our plan is for half of them to be women and people of color," said United CEO Scott Kirby. "We're excited that JPMorgan Chase has agreed to support our work to diversify our pilot ranks and create new opportunities for thousands of women and people of color who want to pursue a career in aviation."
Forget the “guaranteed a job” part and focus on the rest. They have a “plan” to “create new opportunities” for people who may not know that they can realistically become a pilot. That’s it. It is all about raising awareness that people from all walks of life can become pilots. As I explained to my dad numerous times, many kids are still shocked to see a woman or person of color at the controls when they visit the flight deck. I would think you, of all people, would understand this. But instead you choose to focus on your Fox News talking points.
Pretty sure everyone who has ever crashed a Part 121 airliner was current and qualified in accordance with the Company’s and regulator’s requirements.
All corporate pilots pass checkrides. Its my job to make sure they do.You are 100% correct.
This argument that somebody is unqualified just because they have failed checkrides is insane. Now, do we want to have the conversation that companies should look at checkride failures and maybe not hire because of that? Sure! But that's also been a qualifier for companies since I can remember.
I can say that as a DPE, I receive applicants that have failed a PPL multiple times. My job is to evaluate to the ACS. If they show up that day and meet the standard, they get their PPL. Training and checking isn't a perfect system but to imply this has anything to do with DEI just makes anyone who uses that argument, look like a complete moron.
One of my friends and I always discuss it as “On-ramps, off-ramps and turnouts,” not just for proficiency and training, but for aeromedical issues and life stresses, frankly, too.This argument that somebody is unqualified just because they have failed checkrides is insane. Now, do we want to have the conversation that companies should look at checkride failures and maybe not hire because of that? Sure! But that's also been a qualifier for companies since I can remember.
Exhibit #1: the million dollars donated to Trump’s inauguration.Note also that Scott Kirby rather transparently goes whichever way the wind is blowing, to an extent beyond most airline CEOs in my view. It may not be the most wholesome way to run a large, publicly traded company, but it is likely the most logical and profitable.
So uh, what does this mean for the R-ATP military comp and RTAG pilots? Because, hiring someone to check a box (veteran) is DEI hiring.
So uh, what does this mean for the R-ATP military comp and RTAG pilots? Because, hiring someone to check a box (veteran) is DEI hiring.