BrewMaster
Well-Known Member
Nice call!
They'll be along shortly.
![]()
I've been here long enough

I also understand the FAR now, but I don't know if I'd gamble with the FAA on this issue.
Nice call!
They'll be along shortly.
![]()
Nope. If a non-CFI does an EAA Young Eagles flight and allows the child to fly the airplane, the real pilot is still definitely PIC.I was under the impression the only times a pilot not manipulating the controls could act as PIC in an aircraft certified for single pilot operations only, was during the time in which they served as a safety pilot and the other pilot flew under simulated instrument conditions, or when acting as an instructor.
.the only times a pilot not manipulating the controls could log as PIC in an aircraft certified for single pilot operations only, was during the time in which they served as a safety pilot and the other pilot flew under simulated instrument conditions, or when acting as an instructor
DOES mean both can log that time as PIC time in their respective log books?
There is actually no provision in the regulations for logging PIC by right of being the acting PIC, other than when functioning as a safety pilot.
Ok so when two airline pilots go flying and the FO is manipulating the controls, only he is putting anything in the PIC column?
The instructor is logging the PIC time by acting as an instructor, not by acting as PIC. The instructor isn't necessarily the PIC, but can always log the time as such.Same goes for a training flight where the student (lets presume a comm student) get to put anything in the PIC column and the CFI doesn't get to put anything in since he is just acting PIC?
Thanks, that's when I know "mission accomplished."seems almost too easy,
Not quite. It's not a matter of uniqueness for ATPs or CFIs. It's a matter of going through 61.51(e) (the part of FAR 61.51 that deals with logging PIC time) and seeing if what you are doing fits one of the categories.So airline ATP guys are a unique instance, same as flight instructors, all others, if you're flying and rated, you're logging, other wise you're not.
Like Mid life said, the CFI is logging PIC under the CFI provision, but the ATP is logging time, only when he is a required crew member, which would be as acting PIC on a 121 flight. The FO is logging SIC, unless he has the applicable type rating, and in the case of 121 an ATP certificate. This is also why the only time two people with neither being a CFI are both logging PIC, is when one is under the foggles, because then they are both required crew membersSo airline ATP guys are a unique instance, same as flight instructors, all others, if you're flying and rated, you're logging, other wise you're not.
Thanks sir,
Since I'm still a student pilot and working on time building leading up to my comm cert I have yet to get into the whole PIC/SIC time regs but will certainly start looking into it more. Is SIC time something people put in a separate column? Doesn't seem like any job ad I have seen asks for any SIC time, I'm guessing it just keeps adding to the TT column.
Even if it's a "pay for SIC" program? :deadhorse:
If it is a 135 program, yes, since all 135 required 2 people on board, unless they have approval for the autopilot.
It does? Where do you get that?If it is a 135 program, yes, since all 135 required 2 people on board, unless they have approval for the autopilot.