Logging Sim Time with Students

"I never logged dual given in the sim."

Is this what they teach you at ATP Clocks? I'm impressed..... (not)

It's called "training time" now. Check 61.1 (b) (16)

The only way your are right is if what ATP calls a "sim" is neither an approved ground trainer or flight simulator. If that's the case, then ATP has much bigger problems than your silly reg misinterpretation.
I did my flight training at KSU :). Just my MEI/II at ATP.

KSU did teach me about this reg though:
61.51 Pilot logbooks.
(a) Training time and aeronautical experience. Each person must document and record the following time in a manner acceptable to the Administrator:
(1) Training and aeronautical experience used to meet the requirements for a certificate, rating, or flight review of this part.
(2) The aeronautical experience required for meeting the recent flight experience requirements of this part.
If I don't want to log time as a CFI in the FTD, super for me.

I haven't gotten to chat with you in a while. I kind of miss it :)
 
The math isn't difficult, and I don't think one way or the other is "right" or "wrong" but I think that, whichever way you choose to do the bookkeeping, it needs to be consistent and clear.

Thanks Mark, this was the explanation I couldn't seem to conjure up on my own. I agree, to each his own on the logging but it would seem a good idea to take the 'easy' road on this one IMHO :) No sense in making life more confusing than it needs to be.
 
Thanks Mark, this was the explanation I couldn't seem to conjure up on my own. I agree, to each his own on the logging but it would seem a good idea to take the 'easy' road on this one IMHO :) No sense in making life more confusing than it needs to be.
Explaining this is one of the things I think a CFI should do with the very first lesson in a sim or ftd. First, I think that the choice of method used in the student's logbook belongs to the student. But more important, it will prepare a student who runs into a CFI who chooses to do it differently to understand the difference and deal with it.
 
If you're a CFI, and your giving instruction in an approved ground trainer, you can log the time as "dual given". This concept hasn't changed in 20 years.

Sure you can log it, but why? My interpretation is that you can log whatever you want, as long as you also log what IS required (for currency and/or to meet requirements for other ratings). Dual instruction in a sim/FTD isnt required to be logged.
 
Sure you can log it, but why?
Because it counts.

==============================
§ 61.159 Aeronautical experience: Airplane category rating.
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a person who is applying for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category and class rating must have at least 1,500 hours of total time as a pilot that includes at least:
==============================

Now, all those "at leasts" require "flight time" and there are some limitations as to how much "device time" you can count toward the total, but, within those limitaions, the time you taught in a sim counts because 61.1(b)(12) says

==============================
Pilot time means that time in which a person -
(i) Serves as a required pilot flight crewmember;
(ii) Receives training from an authorized instructor in an aircraft, flight simulator, or flight training device; or
(iii) Gives training as an authorized instructor in an aircraft, flight simulator, or flight training device.
==============================

My interpretation is that you can log whatever you want, as long as you also log what IS required
FWIW, mine is a little different. You can't log whatever you want. Whatever you do log must be authorized by an FAR or you must identify it as "doesn't count for anything" in some way.
 
Hey man, you ATP guys log whatever floats your boat. The argument was made that it was inappropriate to log "dual instruction" when teaching in a "sim". That is incorrect and was the only reason I bothered to respond.

ATP claims 190 hours of multi in ACPP, but 50 hours of it is in a "sim". If ATP CFI's are taught that they shouldn't log the time in said "sims", perhaps said "sims" are not FAA approved ground trainers. If this is the case, then ATP would have some explaining to do.....
 
Hey man, you ATP guys log whatever floats your boat. The argument was made that it was inappropriate to log "dual instruction" when teaching in a "sim". That is incorrect and was the only reason I bothered to respond.

ATP claims 190 hours of multi in ACPP, but 50 hours of it is in a "sim". If ATP CFI's are taught that they shouldn't log the time in said "sims", perhaps said "sims" are not FAA approved ground trainers. If this is the case, then ATP would have some explaining to do.....

ATP sims are approved simulators, Instructors log dual given and thats all, Students log FTD time,.. nothing wrong with that.
 
"... nothing wrong with that."

I never said there was. Clocks (an ATP guy) did in his post above. I was just trying to figure out it was some weird ATP policy or just him.
 
Whats "dual given" used for anyways? Its not a requirement for anything with the FAA, except for the 200 hours required to do initial instructors. Even then the regs say "For training in preparation for an airplane, rotorcraft, or powered-lift rating, have given at least 200 hours of flight training as a flight instructor", meaning dual given from a sim doesn't count. I don't think employers care much about "dual given" time you have either...
 
"I don't think employers care much about "dual given" time you have either..."

If you were looking for a CFI job, or a sim instructor job down the road, they might. Also, if you were looking to get into the training dept at your airline.
 
I've personally seen FTD/SIM time also logged (in addition to FTD) as Simulated Instrument/Hood in some logbooks.

I don't see how this is possible.
 
Back
Top