Logging high performance and multi time

Actually ran into this safety pilot debacle today. Was prepping to take a T-210 up tonight to do some civvie flying and was wanting to crank out some approaches under the hood for the hell of it....been a while since my regular light single days. Out of 4 military/BP guys I approached to go with me (guys readily available), 2 had ATP/AMEL only, 1 Comm/AMEL only, and the 4th was an ATP/Rotorcraft-Helo guy! The AMELs had never flown a single-engine anything, and the helo guy had never flown a fixed-wing.

I can't win for losing! :banghead:

Next time, I'm just going to solicit here.
 
Actually ran into this safety pilot debacle today. Was prepping to take a T-210 up tonight to do some civvie flying and was wanting to crank out some approaches under the hood for the hell of it....been a while since my regular light single days. Out of 4 military/BP guys I approached to go with me (guys readily available), 2 had ATP/AMEL only, 1 Comm/AMEL only, and the 4th was an ATP/Rotorcraft-Helo guy! The AMELs had never flown a single-engine anything, and the helo guy had never flown a fixed-wing.

I can't win for losing! :banghead:

Next time, I'm just going to solicit here.

Wow... you'd think one of the fixed wing guys would have taken a weekend to get a single-engine add-on, if only to pass the time.
 
If you do not have an AMEL rating on the back of your pilot certificate, you cann't log even one second as PIC unless you are the only human being in the airplane.

In terms of the safety pilot time, all the safety pilot rule requires is category and class ratings, which you say you have. Of course, none of that time is PIC since in order to log PIC as a safety pilot you have to act as PIC, which you can't do without the HP endorsement in a HP aircraft.

It's all in 2 regs. 61.51 (universal rule of logging time) and 91.109 (the safety pilot requirement).

How do you log the BS "performing the duties of PIC" that the initial multi requires? I have never supported logging it as PIC since 61.51 doesn't say you can, but some DPEs have made me change it.
 
And that is still my position. Otherwise both people can't log it.

Let's (for arguments sake) say that the hooded pilot was ACTING as PIC... Then what reg allows the safety pilot to log that time under "pic".
None. 61.51(f) allows him to log it as SIC.

I'm not sure what your goal is. If it's both pilots logging PIC then, yes, the safety pilot has to be (and be qualified to be) PIC.

But the original question was
Can you log safety pilot time in Cessna 310 ( high performance, multi a/c), if you have only a multi commercial license? I don't have a high performance endorsement.
Not one word about anyone, let alone both pilots, logging PIC, just logging flight time as a safety pilot. And the answer to the question is a very clear "yes."

Whether the safety pilot flight time is PIC or SIC is a separate question, the asnwer to which depends on which pilot is acting as PIC.

Seems that you're jumbling bits and pieces of the acting/logging/safety pilot rules together instead of separating it into three simpler questions:

1. What are the qualifications of a safety pilot? (private pilot, current medical, category and class ratings)

2. How may the safety pilot log the flight time under 61.51? (as PIC or SIC depending on which pilot is acting as PIC)

3. What are the qualifications to act as PIC (or SIC)? (depends on the aircraft and the operation).
 
None. 61.51(f) allows him to log it as SIC.

I'm not sure what your goal is. If it's both pilots logging PIC then, yes, the safety pilot has to be (and be qualified to be) PIC.

First, I agree with everything else you said and Cleared is wrong.

However, this I do disagree with. For safety pilot operations one logs PIC the other SIC. If the safety pilot is able to fly that aircraft and act as PIC then they can work out between themselves who gets how much of PIC/SIC time. Also PIC+SIC should = total time in this type of situation.

Both logging PIC is not allowed in this case because the term acting PIC for this case would be defined under the sole manipulator of the controls clause as stated earlier. It is not possible to have two sole manipulators to my knowledge. However, that being said, I doubt anyone would ever chase you down over it.
 
How do you log the BS "performing the duties of PIC" that the initial multi requires? I have never supported logging it as PIC since 61.51 doesn't say you can, but some DPEs have made me change it.

Add a column: Acting PIC :)
 
That is my argument, as well, but you know how it can be dealing with DPEs.

Yes. You have to hit them with a rolled up newspaper sometimes. Here's one from the old Part 61 FAQs:

QUESTION: I hold a private pilot certificate with an airplane single engine land and instrument airplane rating. I'm working on receiving my commercial pilot certificate, with an airplane multiengine land and instrument ratings.

I was sent home from a checkride by an examiner due to incomplete endorsements and log book issues. I have a question regarding the log books entries for the flight time required to meet 61.129(b)(4). I have perused the part 61 FAQ, and it appears to be in conflict with the requirements of the examiner.

Per § 61.51, I understand I cannot log PIC time in a multi-engine airplane, since I do not hold an airplane multiengine rating. Per § 61.129(b)(4), time spent "performing the duties of pilot-in-command in a multiengine airplane with an authorized instructor" may be credited toward the 10 hours required by that rule.

The examiner wants to see these flights in my logbook with the time logged in the “PIC” column and not logged in the "Dual Received" column. He additionally wants each flight to carry the wording “performed as PIC” in the instructor's handwriting and with the instructor's signature. Is that correct logging? I don't see how it can be, given the requirements of § 61.51.

The examiner also wants my form FAA Form 8710-1 application to show (at least) 10 hours of PIC time in the Beechcraft Duchess (BE-76) in which I'm taking the test. He specifically wants to see this in Section II.A, box "2b" of the form. Is this correct? I'm concerned about this because the box is marked simply "Pilot in command," and does not contain the “performing the duties of pilot in command” wording. I want to be sure my application is accurate.

Also, is it possible for me to receive any instruction and also "perform the duties of PIC" at the same time? I'm not asking this in order to combine the requirements of § 61.129(b)(3) and § 61.129(b)(4). I have over 34 hours in a multiengine airplane in preparation for this rating. I just want to be sure I understand what needs to happen on flights where I "perform the duties of PIC" to meet the requirements of § 61.129(b)(4). Is being sole manipulator of the controls enough? (With very minor exceptions where I asked the instructor to demonstrate a maneuver, I've been the sole manipulator of the controls on every flight I've taken since my first multiengine airplane lesson). Also, I received a logbook endorsement from my instructor midway through my training wherein he stated that I was qualified to perform the duties of PIC (that is, it's a solo endorsement).

Finally, I want to be certain that I meet the requirements of § 61.129(b)(3)(i). I have 5.3 hours of simulated and actual instrument time in the Beech Duchess. So I have the five hours of instrument training in a multiengine airplane required by § 61.129(b)(3)(i). My question is whether the other 5 hours (for a total of 10 hours) needs to be specifically in preparation for the commercial pilot certificate, or if my original instrument training time (in pursuit of my instrument rating) and training time spent in the pursuit of an Instrument Competency Check may be credited toward the requirements of this section.

ANSWER: Ref. § 61.129(b)(4) and § 61.51(e)(1)(i); An applicant may not log as Pilot-In-Command (PIC) for time acquired while performing the duties of pilot-in-command with an authorized instructor unless the person holds an airplane multiengine land rating on his/her pilot certificate. For logging purposes, the time shall be logged in the AMEL column, conditions of flight column, dual received column, and total time column. In the remarks column, your flight instructor should record “PIC training per § 61.129(b)(4).”

For example, let’s say the applicant performs a 5 hour cross-country flight with an authorized instructor aboard for the § 61.129(b)(4)(i) requirement. In recording this time (i.e., “. . . performing the duties of pilot in command . . . with an authorized instructor . . .”) in the applicant’s logbook, it would read as follows:

Airplane multiengine land time: 5 hours
Cross-country time: 5 hours
Dual Received time: 5 hours
Total Time: 5 hours
Description of training: PIC training per § 61.129(b)(4).
John Doe, CFI #5555555, Exp. 12-31-00

In answer to your question concerning where to record the 10 hours of performing duties of pilot in command on the FAA Form 8710-1, Airman Certificate and/or Rating Application, it is understood that the application doesn’t have a performing duties of pilot in command column. The 10 hours performing the duties as PIC with an instructor on board should be listed in the “Pilot in Command” column of the “Airman Certificate and/or Rating Application” (FAA Form 8710-1).

In answer to your question concerning whether it is possible for you to receive instruction while also "performing the duties of PIC." The intent of this provision in § 61.129(b)(4) [i.e., “. . . performing the duties of pilot in command . . . with an authorized instructor . . .”] is to permit an authorized instructor to be aboard the multiengine airplane and the instructor should only act like an SIC. The instructor should observe, evaluate, and may train the student on performing the duties of pilot in command in a multiengine airplane (e.g., CRM training). The instructor should confine their activities to giving training on “. . . performing the duties of pilot in command . . . on the areas of operation listed in § 61.127(b)(2) . . .” The instructor should put more emphasis on acting like an SIC so the applicant gets the benefit and experience of performing the duties of a pilot in command in crew concept setting (e.g. CRM training). The intent of § 61.129(b)(4), in essence, is to provide for the kind of training that is commonly referred to as crew resource management (CRM) training.

In answer to your question concerning whether “. . . the other 5 hours (for a total of 10 hours) needs to be specifically in preparation for the commercial pilot certificate, or if your original instrument training time (in pursuit of my instrument rating) and training time spent in the pursuit of an Instrument Competency Check may be credited toward the requirements of this section.” If an applicant already holds an instrument rating, and is seeking an additional aircraft class rating within the same category of aircraft rating then that applicant need not accomplish an additional “. . . 10 hours of instrument training . . .”. However, the instructor will be expected to provide the applicant with enough instrument training in order for the applicant to demonstrate satisfactory proficiency and competency on Area of Operation VII Navigation.

For further explanation here is an excerpt of the preamble of the final rule correction document that was issued in the Federal Register (78 FR 20284; Amdt. No. 61-104) on April 23, 1998:

In addition, the FAA has revised § 61.129(b)(4) to permit an applicant for a commercial pilot certificate with a multiengine rating to credit the 10 hours of flight time performing the duties of PIC in a multiengine airplane required by that paragraph toward the 100 hours of PIC flight time required under § 61.129(b)(2). This revision is consistent with the provisions of § 61.129(b) as proposed in Notice No. 95-11. As previously noted, proposed § 61.129(b)(4) would have required an applicant to accomplish solo flight time in a multiengine airplane. The solo flight time would have constituted PIC flight time; therefore, the applicant would have been able to credit that flight time toward the requirements of § 61.129(b)(2). However, under § 61.129(b)(4) as adopted in the final rule, an applicant would be performing the duties of PIC rather than acting as PIC. Consequently, that flight time does not constitute PIC flight time. Therefore, the FAA has revised § 61.129(b)(4) to permit the crediting of flight time accomplished under that paragraph toward the requirements of § 61.129(b)(2). However, this revision does not permit an applicant to log the flight time required under § 61.129(b)(4) as PIC flight time under § 61.51(e) unless the applicant holds a private pilot certificate with a multiengine rating and chooses to accomplish the requirements with an authorized instructor.
 
First, I agree with everything else you said and Cleared is wrong.

However, this I do disagree with. For safety pilot operations one logs PIC the other SIC. If the safety pilot is able to fly that aircraft and act as PIC then they can work out between themselves who gets how much of PIC/SIC time. Also PIC+SIC should = total time in this type of situation.

Both logging PIC is not allowed in this case because the term acting PIC for this case would be defined under the sole manipulator of the controls clause as stated earlier. It is not possible to have two sole manipulators to my knowledge. However, that being said, I doubt anyone would ever chase you down over it.

You are confusing the terms...

Pilot 1: The flying pilot, under the hood. Sole Manipulator PIC. 61.51(e)(1)(i)
Pilot 2: Safety Pilot, ACTING as PIC, determined before the flight. 61.51(e)(1)(iii)

They are both able to LOG PIC, since the regulations (91.109) requires the safety pilot to be there. Read 61.51(e)(1)(iii) carefully. Obviously, the times Pilot 1 is not under the hood, he is the only one able to log PIC.
 
For safety pilot operations one logs PIC the other SIC. I

No, MidlifeFlyer is correct. It's possible for both pilots to log PIC in this (and other) situations. One is logging it as sole manipulator and the other is logging it as the acting PIC.
 
Hi Everyone,

Can you log safety pilot time in Cessna 310 ( high performance, multi a/c), if you have only a multi commercial license? I don't have a high performance endorsement.

Since you do not have the high performance endorsement, you may NOT log PIC time per 61.31(f). You may; however, log it as SIC time (if you meet qualifications under 61.55) since under the circumstances of that flight, you are a required crewmember.

You do not need the high performance endorsement to act as safety pilot per FAA Chief Counsel (from FARs Explained, Kent Jackson and Joseph Brennan):

"While our opinion is that there is no regulatory requirement that a safety pilot have a high performance endorsement to act as safety pilot, we are advised by the General Aviation & Commercial Division of the Flight Standards Service that they have always encouraged those pilots to be thoroughly familiar and current in the aircraft that is used. We are also advised by the General Aviation and Commercial Division that the FAA is currently in the process of reviewing the appropriate parts of the FAR to determine, among other things, if a safety pilot should be required to have a high performance endorsement. (6-24-91)"
 
Since you do not have the high performance endorsement, you may NOT log PIC time per 61.31(f). You may; however, log it as SIC time (if you meet qualifications under 61.55) since under the circumstances of that flight, you are a required crewmember.

A day late and a dollar short...:laff:

In this situation, you may log your safety pilot time as PIC as long as you were acting as PIC.
 
"While our opinion is that there is no regulatory requirement that a safety pilot have a high performance endorsement to act as safety pilot, we are advised by the General Aviation & Commercial Division of the Flight Standards Service that they have always encouraged those pilots to be thoroughly familiar and current in the aircraft that is used. We are also advised by the General Aviation and Commercial Division that the FAA is currently in the process of reviewing the appropriate parts of the FAR to determine, among other things, if a safety pilot should be required to have a high performance endorsement. (6-24-91)"
And almost 18 years later, they still haven't done it :D
 
I will have to respectuflly disagree here. 61.51 allows you to LOG anything you are rated for if you are the sole manipulator. In order to ACT as pic in an aircraft you need any applicable endorsements (high perf, complex, etc.). It is for this reason that all flight training in a complex airplane towards gaining a complex endorsement may be LOGGED as pic time. The CFI is ACTING as PIC in these flights. See 61.31(e) and note the use of the word "ACT" versus the word "LOG" in 61.51.

this is correct. in order to log PIC you only need be appropriately RATED in the aircraft. You CAN log PIC even if you do not have the endorsement for HP. That's an endorsement not a RATING.
 
Back
Top