Wow.
Just wow.
Anyway,
@av8tr1 ever hear of CRM/TEM?
Welcome to 135. Some outfits are awesome, have great CRM and do a good job with the threat-error-management game, others...well, not so much. I'm lucky enough to work for one that I think is pretty damn good, but I have worked for some in the past where those concepts are somewhat alien. At my first 135 job flying cargo as an FO, at 500 hours, the crotchety old CP there was somewhat legendary for being particularly old school. I was told by a buddy who'd gone through groundschool before me to just shut up and keep my head down during training and he was right. Apparently a few years before I got there someone posed the question, "but what about CRM?" Apparently, he stood up, threw his pen down and shouted, "CRM?! CRM?! YOU KNOW WHAT CRM STANDS FOR?! IT STANDS FOR DO YOUR F-ING JOB!" and stormed out. I guess class was over for the day after that. He was one of those guys who came back to working 135 after he couldn't work 121 anymore from what I gather, and has since disappeared to wherever those old pelicans go - I imagine he's well into his 70's now if he's even still alive. He was always nice to me, and treated me fairly (even when I didn't deserve it), but you gotta figure, he ran a training department where he inculcated that sort of philosophy into dozens of pilots along the way. What kind of downstream repercussions will that create I doubt we'll ever know. He knew the systems better than flight safety, but he was certainly of the "Captain is God" mentality.
Part of the problem in 135 safety culture is that a lot people simply don't know of a "better" way to do things. They've never been exposed to an operation that had the budget to have a real safety program or a real training program, and now, they're making it up as they go. This is especially the case in simpler airplanes where checklists may have been written by lawyers in Wichita rather than pilots, and never revised by managers that never used them anyway. There are tons of guys with multiple thousands of hours of experience (sometimes even in the tens of thousands of hours) who've never actually heard about ASAP, or SMS, or TEM. Sure these guys have heard about CRM - simply because the FAA is always talking about it, and many more have even discussed risk management in great detail - every pilot who doesn't have a death wish talks about how things could be safer, better, or easier. Still, unless you keep up with this sort of stuff on the internet (
@Derg - seriously, thanks, without this website there's no way I'd be able to keep up with the sheer volume of new information coming in without it), it's easy to fall through the cracks in 135.
There
isn't pro-standards at most 135 outfits. There
isn't an official safety program at most small 135 outfits. There
isn't really any stringent mandatory recurrent training at many 135 outfits. Hell, some 135 companies flagrantly violate FARs because it suits them (see basically all of the ad hoc freight operators). 135.351 is pretty lenient in what it allows, and many companies simply do a checkride and written test and send you on your way - this isn't necessarily bad if you have an excellent safety culture at your company, have on-going training events that are outside the scope of 135, and your company has excellent communication systems internally, but if any of those systems are less than effective, you need some recurrent to knock the rust off. Like I said, here we do a good job (recurrent sim training and a sort of CTS system that's pretty nifty), at my old job in ANC we did an excellent job (we were always doing some kind of training outside of simply stuff for the checkride), but there are many places where this is not the case and hazardous attitudes never really get a chance to be addressed because they never get exposed. 135 is great, and I love the flying you get to do in it, but there a lot of bugs in the regs and safety systems to work out, and the burden of safety typically rests on the shoulders of the line pilots - not the company itself in most "ma and pop" style operators.