Autothrust Blue
“If you jump on my shift, that’s just rude, man.”
The star field off the coast was just incredible the past few nights, not gonna lie.
(from FL 240, anyway.)
(from FL 240, anyway.)
Simply solved. Any time I have ANY question whatsoever about obstacle clearance, I fly an instrument approach. I'm sure it causes all sorts of heartache and mean comments, but at the risk of being improper "FU, I used to fly in to Mexico". Mexico is a great place to learn about the omniscience (or lack thereof) of ATC. As far as I can tell, Mexican controllers exist with the sole purpose of decorating the mountains with stupid gringos.
"QUE? UNABLE."
I hate VFR at night in the mountains. I'm like, well there's rocks all around here, I'm descending and I can't see a damn one of them.
You can very quickly become IMC with not a cloud in the sky out there.VFR at night in Nevada is very spooky once you leave the comfort of the city lights. Those were definitely my most memorable rides.
Welcome to summer days in the Ohio Valley. Bleh.You can very quickly become IMC with not a cloud in the sky out there.
Bakersfield was like that yesterday. 2 miles haze, sky clear (gross).Welcome to summer days in the Ohio Valley. Bleh.
TAWS/EGPWS is pretty nifty...and I stick to published terminal routes as much as possible at night.It's always weird when arriving into a populated area, because you can see how a mountain ridge between you and the town is covering part of the towns lights, and slowly revealing more and more... even though you might have several thousand feet over that mountain it's still creepy to know there's a giant rock there that you can only detect because of the distant lights that it's blocking. You cannot "see" the mountain, only the lack of anything discernible in that space... like a black hole, an airplane eating black hole!
And it's not smog or haze, it's just that black.You can very quickly become IMC with not a cloud in the sky out there.
Except it's really hard to fly the IAP when there isn't one. Trust me, I'm IFR 100% of the time that I can be.Simply solved. Any time I have ANY question whatsoever about obstacle clearance, I fly an instrument approach. I'm sure it causes all sorts of heartache and mean comments, but at the risk of being improper "FU, I used to fly in to Mexico". Mexico is a great place to learn about the omniscience (or lack thereof) of ATC. As far as I can tell, Mexican controllers exist with the sole purpose of decorating the mountains with stupid gringos.
"QUE? UNABLE."
Except it's really hard to fly the IAP when there isn't one. Trust me, I'm IFR 100% of the time that I can be.
At 300 kts, I could care less about an extra 20 miles. Besides, I go direct everywhere under IFR anyways.VFR direct everywhere I can. IFR when I need to be(which is still quite frequent). No sense in wasting time(I don't really need the hours anymore in what I fly now), and dangit, I just want to get back on the ground so I can pee!
Errr? Visual approach, not VFR.... Airport or precedingYou still have to have 3 statute miles visibility and remain clear of clouds for a visual.
Errr? Visual approach, not VFR.... Airport or preceding
Anybody else think that LAX plays a little loose and easy with the "visual approach"? Last few times I've been in here the only thing "visual" is the airplane in front of you. Can't see the runway until you're on about a mile final due to smog/fog... whatever it is here.
Ju
Errr? Visual approach, not VFR.... Airport or preceding