Safer in a collision, and statistically more likely to be unable to avoid a collision.
Yeah, but how cool is it that Mr. Miyagi is the Mayor of San Francisco?This guy is freaking me out man!
View attachment 24356
I read the Freakonomics books and listen to the podcast. I think that's where I heard it. I might have remembered their research advocating seat belts instead of car seats for children of a certain age.I just did a search of both freakonomic books I have and neither mention the study. I can't even find the original reasoning from the FAA (With the help of the airlines I'm sure) which was printed long ago. I want to say this was clear back in '78 or something like that.
Larger cars are generally more survivable in accidents, all things being equal
Yes. And more likely to have an accident, all things being equal.
I have to ask...where are the standard callouts before this hot mess? Were they being done? I just don't see/understand how they could have gotten into this situation yet.
If they were sleeping it would explain a lot.
Turkish Airlines, Colgan 3407 and now Asiana 214 have one thing in common - fatigue.
They were either backside of the clock, super early morning or fatigue from commuting due to low pay.
All things are never equal.Larger cars are generally more survivable in accidents, all things being equal
I don't think I have ever been too tired to point an airplane at a runway. I even put down my crossword puzzle.
I have, multiple times.I don't think I have ever been too tired to point an airplane at a runway. I even put down my crossword puzzle.
I have, multiple times.
Fatigue does weird shizzit to even the best pilots.
True. I'm not the best pilot though.
Just reported the left seat was the 43 hour IOE captain. Weird stuff I have seen on big airplanes has often involved IOE captains. Let the baseless, factless speculation begin!
From the little I've read on this so far, and the little that's been discussed on the 777 specifically, it sounds like the Boeing products can be set up for an approach, and not have the A/T protect your speed
I'd always be paranoid in a Miata that my head would be sticking out above the windshield. Open cockpit driving!Yep, my 15 year old M3 is safer than ANY SUV/truck/large car ever made. A miata is even safer!
/end thread drift
I always read that in my head as something very, very different.Hence why I wouldn't be surprised at all if they find that they were in FLCH all the way to the ground...
Rabble rabble...speculation...rabble.
To add: FLCH isn't a valid approach mode in Boeing products; the autothrottle servos are disengaged to allow the pilot to manually adjust climb/descent rate.
I always read that in my head as something very, very different.
Hence why I wouldn't be surprised at all if they find that they were in FLCH all the way to the ground...
Rabble rabble...speculation...rabble.
To add: FLCH isn't a valid approach mode in Boeing products; the autothrottle servos are disengaged to allow the pilot to manually adjust climb/descent rate.
Do autothrottles typically work below 100' ? Because it looks like they were a good ways from the threshold.
I would think it would be normal for them to be disengaged low on a visual anyway, any Boeing drivers care to enlighten stupid me about how they work/are used?
rjmore is the guy to ask about the 777.
767, we disconnect autothrottles for landing unless doing an autoland. Some guys disconnect as late as 50' AGL.