phill1174
Well-Known Member
This is where I almost spit my Mr.Pibb out
It’s sad because it’s true.
- Thread starter derg
- Start date
ClearedForOption
Displaced... again.
Is all I can think of when I see these influencer videos.
Mitch WILL get his revenge….
Was Mitch the same as Huggy? I can’t remember.
SurferLucas
Southern Gentleman
It’s cause there’s more than one aeroplane on approach, mate…like why it’s Maths
Cherokee_Cruiser
Bronteroc
Nothing. Just the fact he wrote it like:
C -
R -
A -
F -
T -
(Like old school style writing it out)
jrh
Well-Known Member
Where does this come from?!?! Several guys at my shop say it and it grates on my nerves every time. They all happen to have military backgrounds. I've never bothered to call them out on it, only cringe and move on.At least you’re not saying “clearance on request to”
BEEF SUPREME
Well-Known Member
Could you Rip & Post your images (instead of links) so we're not all forced to open up our security perimeters to engage with DATA COLLECTION gangsters? You know, those companies that are market-adjudicted to be worth billions simply as a function of their data collection. ...Their actual data is typically vacuous and inane.
I already KNOW that INSTAGRAM (for instance) is sad but true.
DE727UPS
Well-Known Member
jrh
Well-Known Member
Bigger battles to fight is why I cringe and move on. Still, doesn't make it right. It's poor phraseology. No different from "with you" or "taking the active" at an untowered airport.
I just simply say “[callsign], clearance to [destination airport] with [atis code]”. Seems easy enough. IFR is assumed, and the whole reason I’m calling clearance delivery anyway. Otherwise VFR and direction of flight would be stated, if it’s an airport that requires VFRs to also call clearance delivery.
But yeah, as Don said, pilots got this “clearance on request” thing, which makes no sense, because the clearance delivery person is calling (making a request) for your clearance…as it’s not sitting right there in front of them.
But yeah, as Don said, pilots got this “clearance on request” thing, which makes no sense, because the clearance delivery person is calling (making a request) for your clearance…as it’s not sitting right there in front of them.
///AMG
Well-Known Member
You guys laugh, but this phraseology is standard at any naval air station today. You say "[insert stereo routing] clearance on request". They say "I have your clearance on request". And then a couple mins later depending on how busy they are, they say "XXX I have your clearance, advise when ready to copy". And then you say "ready to copy".....and then they read it to you. I'd be interested to know what takes several minutes on their end, perhaps it is just to play the game?
SurferLucas
Southern Gentleman
8hr MX delay, into a 23.50 push time…writing it old skool wraps me in a warm primacy blanket, where I know I’m not likely to write something down wrong.
Nearly 11,000hrs and still practicing the basics.
@DPApilot also laughed tho
juxtapilot
Snowflake
Yea where the eff is this coming from?At least you’re not saying “clearance on request to”
Screaming_Emu
Well-Known Member
I was told there would be no math
Screaming_Emu
Well-Known Member
Sometime in the last year I worked with an FO who was former military. Had been here just about a year. We’re departing ORD for…I dunno, probably Anchorage. He kept telling me when he was getting an updated ATIS, which I thought was weird. Most people just send for it and announce only if anything has changed. So after the 3rd time I realized he was actually tuning the frequency and LISTENING to it. Part of me wanted to ask, but I make a conscious effort to let guys do it their way unless it conflicts with safety or procedure. I mean…he HAD to know…right?