I was having the V-1 thoughts as well. Looks kinda weird seeking what looks like a MK-82 slung under a UAV.
Who cares how modern it is, if it can put bombs on target than it works. With that said, the last thing our country needs is a war with Iran.
There is no way their new "state of the art" bomb dropping device can't make it to Isreal. We all know that is on the top of Iran's priority list. I don't see why they would make their "ambassador of death" not be able to reach the people who they despise so much.
Dear Iran,
It's not a drone if it requires one of these and a truck staying within FM signal line-of-sight:
Your pal,
Doug Taylor
Those who talk don't know. And those who know don't talk. That's all I have to say about that.
Wow! Who did their special effects, Ed Wood?Oh great. Now we got that to lookout for too.
The bigger question is always what is the accuracy.
How close do you have to be with a nuclear weapon?
Closer than some of their missiles were capable of achieving. 100 miles off target is not close enough, especially when we're taking Hawaii or the middle of the pacific.
Yeah fallout, etc but there is a significant difference between radiation and everything is suddenly gone. Which on another topic is why chemical, radiological and biological weapons are not "weapons of mass destruction". Only nuclear weapons of those leave no possible way to salvage the situation.
I would think a $200 piece from Garmin could get that to within a 1/2 mile(or 50 ft?) of where it is supposed to go.
Dude you know the rules:
"چه اتفاقی می افتد در تهران باقی می ماند وجود دارد"