Iran unveils long-range bombing drone

I was having the V-1 thoughts as well. Looks kinda weird seeking what looks like a MK-82 slung under a UAV.

Reminds me of the old USAF CIM-10 BOMARC SAM missile we used to use.
 

Attachments

  • bomarc.jpg
    bomarc.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 50
Who cares how modern it is, if it can put bombs on target than it works. With that said, the last thing our country needs is a war with Iran.


Yeah I was hoping for that NOT to happen. This is something we have to deal with. They are a defence producer and have other industries they have besides energy. I wonder if it can be capable of doing what Iran says it can do. Or it would be like North Korea's failed missles that can't make it to the midwest like they were saying.

It's a funny design:rotfl: That is how I felt when I saw that yesterday.
 
There is no way their new "state of the art" bomb dropping device can't make it to Isreal. We all know that is on the top of Iran's priority list. I don't see why they would make their "ambassador of death" not be able to reach the people who they despise so much.

Look at the map. Between Iran and Israel, they either go through Iraq, where it gets shot down, Turkey where it gets shot down or Saudi Arabia... where I would still bet it gets shot down.
 
:yup:

Ah man I was thinking the same thing. How cheese-ball does that crap look lol! :laff:
 
Those who talk don't know. And those who know don't talk. That's all I have to say about that.

Dude you know the rules:
"چه اتفاقی می افتد در تهران باقی می ماند وجود دارد"​
Ahmadinejad_laser.jpg
 
It looks like a V1 with unguided bombs strapped to the wings (or maybe even drop tanks). Nice work Iran, welcome to the early 20th century.....ughhhh, wait....
 
Oh, Iran. :rolleyes:

Ya know, sometimes I think that if Iran would only just behave, we might never have invaded Iraq.

Then again, we may never know, now.
 
How close do you have to be with a nuclear weapon?

Closer than some of their missiles were capable of achieving. 100 miles off target is not close enough, especially when we're taking Hawaii or the middle of the pacific.
Yeah fallout, etc but there is a significant difference between radiation and everything is suddenly gone. Which on another topic is why chemical, radiological and biological weapons are not "weapons of mass destruction". Only nuclear weapons of those leave no possible way to salvage the situation.
 
Closer than some of their missiles were capable of achieving. 100 miles off target is not close enough, especially when we're taking Hawaii or the middle of the pacific.
Yeah fallout, etc but there is a significant difference between radiation and everything is suddenly gone. Which on another topic is why chemical, radiological and biological weapons are not "weapons of mass destruction". Only nuclear weapons of those leave no possible way to salvage the situation.

Oh OK. Yeah, I'm not too worried about them hitting the US anytime soon. I'm more concerned about our military bases over there and Israel. I wonder why we didn't even seem to try and prevent them from getting the capabilities of producing nuclear weapons.
 
I would think a $200 piece from Garmin could get that to within a 1/2 mile(or 50 ft?) of where it is supposed to go.
 
I would think a $200 piece from Garmin could get that to within a 1/2 mile(or 50 ft?) of where it is supposed to go.

Think about the rockets that were being shot at Israel. If it was that easy, either a)they are the dumbest people alive or b) it's not.
 
Dude you know the rules:
"چه اتفاقی می افتد در تهران باقی می ماند وجود دارد"
Ahmadinejad_laser.jpg


Uh oh! Iranian sci-fi propaganda:cool: Mahmoud in a sci-fi show:rotfl: Star Trek remake!
Willaim Shatner- Well it looks like Tehran has been changed futuristically! Everyone wears fashionable sunglasses and they have UAV's that have not been designed by russian engineers!


Nice pic!
 
Back
Top