MidlifeFlyer said:I don't teach any mnemonic for the approach briefing. I think they (along with most mnemonics) are worthless.
Jeppesen spent years and megabucks developing the "Briefing Strip" based on how professional pilots briefed the approach. It was so good, NACO almost immediately stole it. Why replace that with a mnemonic that will take more time to remember what it stands for than to apply?
jrh said::yeahthat:
I just teach people to step their way through the briefing strip, right to left and top to bottom, setting up their radios and bugs accordingly.
On a full procedure approach, I like to use the 3M acronym when outbound on the procedure turn or on the final vector when being vectored...Missed approach instructions, Minutes from FAF to MAP in case of a glide slope failure, and Minimum altitudes. I think it's important to have those three pieces of information fresh in your head before turning inbound. That's about the only acronym I use though.
Dugie8 said::yeahthat: Agree with everything except the glideslope failure and continuing to LOC only mins, my opinion only though.
jrh said:Just to clarify, I don't continue to LOC mins. I initiate a climb to the missed approach altitude, but knowing the time to the MAP is still required so that you know when you can safely turn.
jrh said:Just to clarify, I don't continue to LOC mins. I initiate a climb to the missed approach altitude, but knowing the time to the MAP is still required so that you know when you can safely turn.
Ralgha said:It's not required. You could start it based on DME, MM crossing, or LOC antenna crossing. All of those are at least as accurate as using time.
Ralgha said:It's not required. You could start it based on DME, MM crossing, or LOC antenna crossing.
Dugie8 said:jrh
Your point is completely valid. Timing for the missed is not a bad idea.
jrh said:I know, I'm not going to quit reviewing the time. As you mentioned, there are numerous nonprecision approaches where time is the only means of knowing when to go missed, or even on an ILS, it's one more piece of situational awareness.
But the question still stands, why do they print a time on the ILS plates if the MAP can be determined by crossing the MM? They must expect pilots to use the time for something, but I don't know what. Is it supposed to be a primary means of navigation or just a backup for other methods, such as crossing the MM?
Dugie8 said:Keep in mind the "footprint" that the MM creates. It is not exact, and neither is timing, but for the sake of appearances time will be printed.
http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0604/05187I35L.PDF Can be done, without ADF or DME, since radar can call out HISER, so you need a way to ID the MAP that is 5.6NM from HISER. Also not from the profile view that the MAP for the LOC approach is slightly past the MM, so if you were to use the MM beeping as your MAP you might end up turning too soon (not a big deal in ND, but you get the idea).
http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0604/00226ILD17R.PDF, Notice DME is required and no times are printed in the timing boxes.
PanJet said:The LOC antenna is at the far end of the runway. On a 10,000 ft. runway that would add almost 2 miles to your MAP; two miles in which you are supposed to be climbing up for the missed. Now maybe in GFK where there isn't anything taller than a cow, that's fine, but I'll give you an example. There are probably much better examples, but the one that comes to mind (because I've shot it before in LIFR and had to go missed) is the ILS 05 in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho (COE). When you go in there you're aimed right at some fairly large hills in almost all directions. If you were to wait until the LOC crossing to start climing, you'd not only be a lot lower, but you'd be a good 1.5-2 miles past where you wanna be and closer to some big hills. Most planes can be up to turning altitude on the missed before they even get to the LOC antenna.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but using the LOC antenna seems a bit scary to me, I'd much rather rely on times at that point. Even if it put me only half a mile closer to the MAP, that's half a mile I'd rather have.
edit: quote erased do to earlier statement edit
What if you have no DME; the MM is INOP and what exactly happens at LOC crossing? What if the MAP is before the "LOC crossing" ? Time would be the only way to not start the turn early on the missed(if a turn is called for).Ralgha said:It's not required. You could start it based on DME, MM crossing, or LOC antenna crossing.
Holding Short said:What if you have no DME; the MM is INOP and what exactly happens at LOC crossing? What if the MAP is before the "LOC crossing" ? Time would be the only way to not start the turn early on the missed(if a turn is called for).
HS