Holding at GPS Waypoints

So my question now is: why do we even state the quadrant if all it seems to do is confuse everyone?

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
It doesn't confuse "everyone." It only confuses those who were not taught what it means. It is actually one if the things providing clarity. Consider the difference between example holds. I'm using a real location so you can look at it.

Hold southeast of NOGIC on V67.
Hold northwest of NOGIC on V67.

1531738333252.png
 
The quadrant us exclusively based on the location of the inbound course. Look at the picture I posted above. There is a reason I did not show either right or left turns. They don't change the location of the inbound course.

I'm glad I bumped into this thread before I started working on my CFII.

That said, I think the confusion here shows that holding and holding clearances, as a general rule, need a big revision. Because it sure isn't taught that way! Or understood that way by many, many pilots.

-Fox
 
I'm glad I bumped into this thread before I started working on my CFII.

That said, I think the confusion here shows that holding and holding clearances, as a general rule, need a big revision. Because it sure isn't taught that way! Or understood that way by many, many pilots.

-Fox

You nailed it. It's the fault of how they are taught. They are one of those simple things taught in an overly complicated way.

I was totally confused by holds. Anything other than a published one was beyond me. Screwed up direct entries! I'd sit for hours in front of MS Flight Simulatir with a deck of cards with holding instructions and do them wrong. Somehow managed to luck out on checkrides.

It was actually after I got my II this light bulb came on. I started drawing holding clearances so I could "see" them better and suddenly realized the first two words told me exactly where to draw the line. "On the ### radial" just narrowed it down.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top