Heavy / Large classification

[TheFlyingTurkey]

Heavy and large? I thought this is where you were going...

Forgot, I'm not in the Lav.

 

[Polar742]

"Giant ____ Super" does seem a little pretentious. Right up your alley!

Hell, we may end up paired up soon enough.

 

[dasleben]

Hell, we may end up paired up soon enough.

Mo' money, mo' problems (less bunks, though).

 

[Bernoulli Fan]

@Bernoulli Fan

Would be nice if they included that in the latest .65

Do you remember what I am talking about with regard to performance categories? I remember in basics having a hard time not mixing the two up.

*edit*

I remember. I thought small/large was for same runway separation, clearance to land behind a/c on runway but more than X feet down, etc, but that's categories I, II, and III for single/small, twin/small, and everything else, so not sure what the US definitions are actually for. Here's the complete combined list of US and ICAO type designators anyway:
http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/5-1-1.htm

Scroll down to "Weight Class."