Great photo from GR3 Harrier cockpit...

About to takeoff for his long-endurance hop of a whopping 0.8, with his load of 2 bombs and a gun. :)
 
Looks like a GR.9, the GR.3 was old school and were long gone before the Joint Harrier force operated off of Carriers, with EH101's sitting around.
 
MikeD said:
AV-8A/C of the USMC were the best Harriers.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't know, saw very few of them growing up in the UK. Only the BAe one's. The odd one came through Lakenheath or for the Mildenhall Air Fete, but that's a while back.
 
PK said:
I wouldn't know, saw very few of them growing up in the UK. Only the BAe one's. The odd one came through Lakenheath or for the Mildenhall Air Fete, but that's a while back.
Click to expand...

It's just personal like, not based on any kind of capabilities comparisons or anything. The small compact A-model Harriers just looked like sports cars.
 
MikeD said:
It's just personal like, not based on any kind of capabilities comparisons or anything. The small compact A-model Harriers just looked like sports cars.
Click to expand...

I agree, the original ones looked better than the overweight bloated ones.
 
PK said:
I agree, the original ones looked better than the overweight bloated ones.
Click to expand...

Yes. The new ones....B model for USMC, GR9 for UK; all look bloated. Much like looking at an F-16A block 5 clean, next to an F-16E/F Block 60 with all it's attachments, conformal fuel tanks, etc.

The early, day attack Harriers like the A/C just looked nimble. But were apparently the ones that could bite a pilot in the butt quickly if he wasn't on his game.
 
Last edited:
thats a really cool pic, thanks for sharing (even if its a video game) Those brit carrier decks look so freaking small
 
MikeD said:
Yes. The new ones....B model for USMC, GR9 for UK; all look bloated. Much looking at an F-16A block 5 clean, next to an F-16E/F Block 60 with all it's attachments, conformal fuel tanks, etc.

The early, day attack Harriers like the A/C just looked nimble. But were apparently the ones that could bite a pilot in the butt quickly if he wasn't on his game.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I remember seeing photo's from the early 80's where the RN were using the Harrier during the Falklands and it looked like a useful attack aircraft. Having seen later versions, they just appear like they were designed to do too much. And consequently lost the ability to do what Hawker Siddley had designed them to do.
 
The Paveway II family of bombs looks downright outrageous on their little wings.....a GBU-12 looks a little funny, but -10 and -16 are downright comical looking
 
Is the camera angle doing funny things or does that flight deck have a ramp off the end of it? Ever take that Harrier off any sweet jumps?
 
rframe said:
Is the camera angle doing funny things or does that flight deck have a ramp off the end of it? Ever take that Harrier off any sweet jumps?
Click to expand...

The Royal Navy carriers had a ski jump on the end to assist the Sea Harriers get airborne. It was kind of cool seeing them practice at home base.
 
PK said:
The Royal Navy carriers had a ski jump on the end to assist the Sea Harriers get airborne. It was kind of cool seeing them practice at home base.
Click to expand...

We don't need no stinkin ski jumps!:cool:
web_130729-N-KE519-052.JPG
 
H46Bubba said:
We don't need no stinkin ski jumps!:cool:
web_130729-N-KE519-052.JPG
Click to expand...

I think it helped them not have to use thrust vectoring to depart with a larger load out. Sounds right to me. But I could be miles off.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top