Great Lakes Pilots

Milesar

Well-Known Member
I’d like to bring a couple of quick points to the table here, as well as ask for others opinions on the matter as well. Occasionally as Great Lakes gets mentioned on the boards various comments get tossed out to different degrees; of those have been both positive and negative, however some I personally feel that are unwarranted.

Let me start by saying I am not defending the company by any means, but more the pilot group itself.

Its no secret that Lakes is a low paying carrier, infact I do believe it’s the lowest paying airline. For those unfamiliar with our operations I invite you to take a look at our market, better actually spend some time at one of our fabulous destinations and I think it will be quite apparent that we don’t move a whole lot of people. Its not in our scope to serve routes that can be served by a major airline, not only are the aircraft not suited to that but we’re a regional carrier and its kept at that.

Can the pay be better? Absolutely. Should we be paid more? Absolutely. However at times there appears to be an argument that we are “lowering the bar” or “bringing down the collective pilot group” by flying with these type of wages. I have to disagree because with the amount of people we fly at those speeds to those destinations I find it highly unlikely another airline will use that in a bargaining argument.

Before I signed that almighty training contract, I made sure I wasn’t stepping on anyones toes by working in such an environment, the rest of us here most likely shared similar thoughts. The pilot group is very pro active on improving the working conditions, unfortunately in the past few years being represented by IBT 747 didn’t allow us to get the leverage we wanted, a movement was started at the beginning of the year to make a change and we recently voted in a new union with 78% participation from the pilot group.

The work definitely isn’t for anyone, it is an embarrassing pay scale and I totally understand when someone would rather keep another job rather than, in many cases, take a pay cut to work for an airline; However for some it can work, and it’s a great opportunity to be able to capitalize on.

I’d really like to hear some opinions/thoughts from other airline pilots on how they feel about it. I’ve only been doing this for a short time and really don’t know much, I only started paying attention to the industry a few years back. If in anyway you feel we are lowering the bar, how could the pilot group remedy it? Although we work at different carries I do feel like we’re all in this together.

All just friendly, informative discussion.:)
 
As a former "Laker" I'll back up Milesar. Great Lakes isn't a great company but the pilot group is fantastic. Pay and working conditions can be tough and it's not for everyone. However, for the right person it can be a good place to get a career started.
 
Appreciate the insight Milesar.

We're all in this fight together.

That being said, as an analysis of the current environment. . .

If a company flying B1900 with some of the lowest (if not the) labor wages in the industry on EAS subsidized routes are having trouble meeting their financial obligations (to the point that they are furloughed individuals) it's a testiment to the strugles all of our companies are facing in trying to run a profitable company.
 
I personally don't' see GLA as a regular airline in the sense of the rest of the regionals. It's more like a charter/pt135 op out there that does regular EAS runs. The business as well as the low pay doesn't conflict with other regionals because they can't be used at the bargaining table. If you can put up with the low pay, why not?
 
I personally don't' see GLA as a regular airline in the sense of the rest of the regionals. It's more like a charter out there that does regular EAS runs. The business as well as the low pay doesn't conflict with other regionals because they can't be used at the bargaining table. If you can put up with the low pay, why not?

Exactly. They're a different animal in my book, and if the model of business is successful and the work groups are able to succeed in bring some high quality QOL, benefits, and wage advances all the more power to them.

Sadly we've watched more than one EAS contracted disappear over the past 12 months. With the decrease in supply, perhaps GLA is destined to succeed where others have failed since they are one of the few EAS specialist still in business.

Nevertheless, we are all professional pilots who should be seeking to improve our work environments and our own personal bottom line on a constant basis. The company is doing it - so should we. A GLA pilot is no different than a 25 year Delta 777 Captain.
 
The pay sucks, the management and the daily bull**** we put up with sucks, but I fly with an awesome group of guys and girls. The furloughs happened because lakes refuses to pay decent money for airplanes, if we had more we would not furlough. That being said we fly a 19 seat airplane for 19 seat pay, but I guarentee that will change with the new union. This pilot group is not going anywhere for a while with the industry being what it is so they will work for better conditions. Before I think the attitude was who cares im only here for a year, now we know its us it affects, not a newbie newhire. BTW bash lakes we dont care because some day you will meet a laker, have a beer and realize you were a doushe all those years...:crazy:
 
I don't doubt that GL has a great pilot group, but come on. I don't see how anyone can defend flying a B1900 for less than CFIs get for teaching a PPL student in a 172......
 
I don't doubt that GL has a great pilot group, but come on. I don't see how anyone can defend flying a B1900 for less than CFIs get for teaching a PPL student in a 172......

FO's at Lakes make more than I made as a full time instructor and the busiest flight school at a busy metro Denver airport. Hence the reason I came over. Captain's at Lakes make a lot more than your average CFI CFII MEI(especially now with the downturn in training). Don't just look at the hourly wage either. Have your Gold Seal super instructor and a Lakes FO/Capt (equal TT) go into any flying job interview and see who gets the job...

I agree with Tony that comparing Lakes to any other regional is comparing apples to oranges. I believe we fly the smallest regional airliner in the 1900D. That being said, we get paid more per seat that most of the 50 seat jet operators. $16/19 seats = .84 dollars per seat, 21/50= .42 dollars per seat. You could even compare second year pay and a good regional at 35 bucks an hour and you still aren't close. If you were to get paid $.84 per seat on your 50 seater, you'd be making $42/hr.

I think one of the few benefits about Lakes is that it brews some high quality pilots... Just my two cents.
 
Captain's at Lakes make a lot more than your average CFI CFII MEI(especially now with the downturn in training). Don't just look at the hourly wage either.

some of my colleagues and I would need to be 9yr capts on the EMB120 to make similar pay.......

Have your Gold Seal super instructor and a Lakes FO/Capt (equal TT) go into any flying job interview and see who gets the job...

that i can agree with. I would have considered applying to Lakes if the pay was even remotely close to what i make now. The flying they do into the airports they fly into is right up my alley and my personality.

MEOW
 
some of my colleagues and I would need to be 9yr capts on the EMB120 to make similar pay.......

Wow... Thats good to hear! I think my old flight school is gonna close its doors. MEOW MEOW MEOW!!!
but then again if you were to look at monthly guarantee then it would be similar if i worked that little and i wouldn't mind working less, but then i would just spend more than i already do.
 
The monthly guarantee was a big thing for me, that combined with per-diem, some kind of Medical coverage and a piddly 401K made it worth it.

When I instructed it wasn't a steady income, some months I made more than an FO here and other months I made less... I wasn't much of a salesman to my students to keep them on the schedule more than they could afford as well as being at the mercy of the weather for a paycheck.
 
FO's at Lakes make more than I made as a full time instructor and the busiest flight school at a busy metro Denver airport. Hence the reason I came over. Captain's at Lakes make a lot more than your average CFI CFII MEI(especially now with the downturn in training). Don't just look at the hourly wage either. Have your Gold Seal super instructor and a Lakes FO/Capt (equal TT) go into any flying job interview and see who gets the job...


I was an instructor at a busy flight school in Dallas, and I woulda taken a huge pay cut to go to GL. With a wife and a 1 year old, I couldn't afford to do that. I also say it's pretty unfair to automagically assume a Lakes FO is gonna get a job over a CFI as well. It depends on the individuals experience and how well they interview.
 
I am an instructor at a busy flight school in Dallas and I would take a huge (50%) pay cut to go to GL. With a wife and a baby due in 8 weeks, I cannot afford to do that. I am a Gold Seal super instructor. I work my ass off to continue to learn and develop my skill and knowledge. I also have worked hard to defend my country and get an ivy league degree.

If I end up in a showcase showdown with a Lakes FO of equal TT, I would guess I would still not be able to hold my own. I fly Seminoles. He/she flies people on turbine equipment with MUCH more complex systems. I'll kick their ass in a lazy 8 contest though. So at least I have that:rawk:
 
I think Great Lakes is a cool stepping stone flight job that will give a guy great experience, but if you're making less than a Great Lakes FO at your flight instructing gig, you need to pull your head out of your posterior and find a new instructing gig.
 
I am an instructor at a busy flight school in Dallas and I would take a huge (50%) pay cut to go to GL. With a wife and a baby due in 8 weeks, I cannot afford to do that. I am a Gold Seal super instructor. I work my ass off to continue to learn and develop my skill and knowledge. I also have worked hard to defend my country and get an ivy league degree.

If I end up in a showcase showdown with a Lakes FO of equal TT, I would guess I would still not be able to hold my own. I fly Seminoles. He/she flies people on turbine equipment with MUCH more complex systems. I'll kick their ass in a lazy 8 contest though. So at least I have that:rawk:

I'm sure if you put the gold seal "super" instructor on ur resume you'll be fine. You really can't compare cfi pay to gl. Hell I made 5k a month instructing and I knew people who made more. Really there's a point where a certain amount of dual given is too much.
 
Great Mistake pilots have always been friendly to me and I LOVE trading 1900 stories. Mistakes, pilots almost always blow my stories out of the water.

Mistakes has just the right formula of pay & out of the way bases and flying that attracts the biggest cowboys I've run across in this industry. Something about the 1900 in general attracts them, I repeatedly asked for the 1900, so I'm sure that makes me as guilty as any.

As far as Mistakes making a good stepping stone: the pay and bad habits you are going to pick up make that a tough argument. I have enough trouble breaking my Colgan cowboy habits.

With all that said, I miss flying the 1900 and if I could justify the paycut and base change I'd go back to flying one. I've still got my cowboy hat.
 
Just to make sure we are clear, the "gold seal super instructor" was pure sarcasm. Shoulda added the tag.

I thought it was funny, I also admire those who do instruct for an extended period of time and not just jump on the first opportunity. Hopefully one day I can take the time and instruct again.

jynxyjoe, what are you flying now? I hope we're not picking up too many bad habits, I think we do get spoiled with what we can get away with in the 1900.
 
Back
Top