ozziecat35
4 out of 5 great lakes prefer Michigan.
Giggity Giggity, just got my invite. Plan on playing with it today and using it for this weekends flying.
It's telling him not to fly on the eastern seaboard today
It's telling him not to fly on the eastern seaboard today![]()
But uh...what's the point?
Planning a flight and filing IFR flight plans on a desktop with a huge screen and a keyboard.But uh...what's the point?
Only if they could make it like fltplan.com and have accurate information then I'd use a desktop version.Planning a flight and filing IFR flight plans on a desktop with a huge screen and a keyboard.
Flight plans you create are automatically synced with the app.
It was apparently a fairly often-requested feature.
Where's the pretty magenta line? I don't see a Direct To button anywhere...
string buddy, string.....Where's the pretty magenta line? I don't see a Direct To button anywhere...
Whoa! Wait!Only if they could make it like fltplan.com and have accurate information then I'd use a desktop version.
No batteries needed. Never runs out of power. Completely flexible cellulose-matrix screen suitable for stuffing in bags or large pockets. Special micro thin graphite-based screen display technology. Sounds like the future to me!
I don't care what it looks like. I care that it provides much more accurate info than ForeFlight with regards to flight planning.Whoa! Wait!
What? What? What?
You actually like the UI of FLTPLN.com??! I'm rapidly reaching old codger status, but FLTPLN is so 1990, or whenever html 1.0 was invented.
I find FLTPLN horribly antiquated and often times, downright frustrating.
I don't care what it looks like. I care that it provides much more accurate info than ForeFlight with regards to flight planning.
The overwhelming majority of 91 crews I deal with use FltPlan.com for planning and filing. It is far superior to ForeFlight for accuracy whether you're needing to do detailed planning or just toss in a quick flight plan.
I've tried to use ForeFlight, adjusting the aircraft info, etc but it simply can't keep up. It's a pretty display for in flight usage, weather, charts. But the ability to select from preferred routes and check various altitudes all on one page and actually have very accurate results seals the deal for FltPlan.com. I've used FltPlan.com on many 5-6 hour flights and had it within a couple of minutes and 50 lbs of my planned numbers.
They both have their pro's and con's but if the boss says we are going to go from point a to b how much fuel do we need and how long will it take? Fltplan is much more accurate, I get a route and I'll be able to tell him in a minute. When we are flying we use Foreflight because it is much better than everything else.Whoa! Wait!
What? What? What?
You actually like the UI of FLTPLN.com??! I'm rapidly reaching old codger status, but FLTPLN is so 1990, or whenever html 1.0 was invented.
I find FLTPLN horribly antiquated and often times, downright frustrating.
No batteries needed. Never runs out of power. Completely flexible cellulose-matrix screen suitable for stuffing in bags or large pockets. Special micro thin graphite-based screen display technology. Sounds like the future to me!
Feel free to draw lines, call Flight Service for a weather briefing, take down those winds aloft, grab your E6B, make the en route wind corrections to figure your time/distance and fuel requirements, and call FSS back to file your flight plan. Then you can join me and wake me from the nap I'd been taking after I finished using a different set of tools.