Firefighters spray foam on wrong plane during engine emergency

fholbert

Mod's - Please don't edit my posts!
20151210153317.jpg


Firefighters mistakenly sprays foam onto an aircraft next to another one that reported an engine fire emergency at the airport in Fuzhou, southeast Fujian Province. The incident caused the runway to be closed for more than 90 minutes and caused delays to many travelers.

Story Here: http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2015/12/fire-fighters-spray-foam-on-wrong-plane.html
 
Almost happened to me in Atlanta one night. In line for takeoff off of 27R abeam taxiway M20 and we watch a Delta MD-80 taking off. Right as he's abeam us a shower of sparks comes shooting out the right engine and he aborts his takeoff. Tower rolls the trucks as he taxis off the runway. A few minutes later trucks pull up to the conga line for 27R aiming their super soakers at the plane holding in position on 27R. They're trying to figure out who to hose down and aren't getting an answer from tower or ground so the plane in position has to beg them not to hide them down. Truck goes down the line and aims the cannon at every aircraft with each plane saying "It's not us" or "He's already off the runway further down." The Delta aircraft with the blown engine was already up Dixie with blown fire bottles by the time fire rescue figured out where he was.

Poor form.
 
The way I look at it and how our particular contract crew trains (we do mostly light aircraft/helo ARFF, but we train and prepare for large aircraft also...who knows when you may get one), we don't begin agent application until there's fire or smoke visible on an engine reported to be, or have been, on fire.

For one, a key to ARFF truck operations is understanding that most trucks only have about 1.5 to 2 minutes of primary agent (foam/water) available, before having to resupply. We, being light aircraft ops, have to ensure that agent is used most effectively, depending on the situation at hand, and most especially when it comes to us having to respond to a large aircraft, as we have no ready resupply tender truck or anything like that. So preemptive use of the primary agent when its not immediately required is, in many cases, wasteful and ineffective. For us, when our primary and secondary agent supply is exhausted, we're done being able to fight fire, as previously mentioned, resupply isn't immediately available..

With no fire/smoke showing on an engine, or even just smoke but no flames, a little prudence goes a long way. For example, seeing flames out the exhaust stacks of a recip or even out the exhaust end of a turbojet isn't an immediate cause for emergency action. It happens, especially on start. If it remains or gets noticeably worse, then that's obvious now it's a problem.

That said, there are times for preemptive action, such as excessively hot brakes, where sitting and waiting or use of cooling fans aren't doing the trick, and the temps are just rapidly rising. Based on the particular manufacturer (Airbus and Boeing specify different), a water mist application (not a high pressure water application) may be appropriate. And there are some other examples of preemptive action.

But generally speaking, it should be obvious most of the time, which aircraft requires immediate intervention by ARFF. Whether that aircraft is burning, smoking heavy, has exit doors open on a taxiway/runway, has slides deployed, etc; elsewise arriving on scene and taking a moment to size up the situation, is often the most prudent course of action..
 
Last edited:
Fire foam sprayed on wrong aircraft at Chinese airport ‘caused 120m yuan in damage to engines’

Twin engines of Fujian Airlines 737 will need to be replaced in costly operation that will take plane out of service for at least one week.
 
Fire foam sprayed on wrong aircraft at Chinese airport ‘caused 120m yuan in damage to engines’

Twin engines of Fujian Airlines 737 will need to be replaced in costly operation that will take plane out of service for at least one week.
I foresee the following conversation happening

And where should we send the bill?
Airline's Response: ARFF
(ARFF phone rings) "Hi this is "Bob" from the XYZ billing department, how would you like to pay for this? We accept all major forms of payment".
ARFF's response: (silence followed by a quick hang up)
 
A friend of mine accidentally landed gear up about 9 years ago. Expensive but repairable until some yoyo ran out from his hangar and discharged a fire extinguisher behind the panel just in case there was a unknown smokeless electrical fire.

The corrosion caused by the fire retardant destroyed everything electrical. The cost of new radios, nav heads and rewiring the panel pushed it beyond a repairable and the insurance company totaled the aircraft.
 
A friend of mine accidentally landed gear up about 9 years ago. Expensive but repairable until some yoyo ran out from his hangar and discharged a fire extinguisher behind the panel just in case there was a unknown smokeless electrical fire.

The corrosion caused by the fire retardant destroyed everything electrical. The cost of new radios, nav heads and rewiring the panel pushed it beyond a repairable and the insurance company totaled the aircraft.

But behind the panel didn't eventually catch fire, right? :D
 
Back
Top