Feds: Obesity Raising Airline Fuel Costs

bap327

New Member
ATLANTA - Heavy suitcases aren't the only things weighing down airplanes and requiring them to burn more fuel, pushing up the cost of flights. A new government study reveals that airlines increasingly have to worry more about the weight of their passengers.

America's growing waistlines are hurting the bottom lines of airline companies as the extra pounds on passengers are causing a drag on planes. Heavier fliers have created heftier fuel costs, according to the government study.

Through the 1990s, the average weight of Americans increased by 10 pounds, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The extra weight caused airlines to spend $275 million to burn 350 million more gallons of fuel in 2000 just to carry the additional weight of Americans, the federal agency estimated in a recent issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

"The obesity epidemic has unexpected consequences beyond direct health effects," said Dr. Deron Burton of the CDC. "Our goal was to highlight one area that had not been looked at before."

The extra fuel burned also had an environmental impact, as an estimated 3.8 million extra tons of carbon dioxide were released into the air, according to the study.

The agency said its calculations are rough estimates, issued to highlight previously undocumented consequences of the ongoing obesity epidemic.

The estimates were calculated by determining how much fuel the 10 extra pounds of weight per passenger represented in Department of Transportation airline statistics, Burton said.

Obesity is a life-or-death struggle in the United States, the underlying cause of 400,000 deaths in 2000, a 33 percent jump from 1990. If current trends persist, it will become the nation's No. 1 cause of preventable death, the CDC said earlier this year.

More than half _ 56 percent _ of U.S. adults were overweight or obese in the early 1990s, according to a CDC survey. That rose to 65 percent in a similar survey done from 1999 to 2002.

Although the Air Transport Association of America has not yet validated the CDC data, spokesman Jack Evans said the health agency's appraisal "does not sound out of the realm of reality."

With most airlines reporting losses blamed partly on record-high fuel costs, everything on an airplane is now a weighty issue. Airlines are doing everything they can to lighten the load on all aircraft, from wide-body jets to turboprops.

Bulky magazines have gone out the door. Metal forks and spoons have been replaced with plastic. Large carry-ons are being scrutinized and even heavy materials that used to make up airplane seats are being replaced with plastic and other lightweight materials.

"We're dealing in a world of small numbers _ even though it has a very incremental impact" to reduce a 60- to 120-ton aircraft's weight by bumping off a few magazines, Evans said. "When you consider airlines are flying millions of miles, it adds up over time."

Although passenger bulk has been an issue in the past _ Dallas-based Southwest Airlines requires large people to buy a second seat for passenger safety and comfort _ Evans says it's not likely airlines will scrutinize how much passengers weigh in the future. Instead, they are trying to do a better job of estimating passenger weight in figuring out how much fuel they need for a flight.

Seattle-based Alaska Airlines now calculates the weight of children on flights, instead of using adult-weight formulas for all passengers, Evans said.

"Just like we don't control the costs of our fuel, we don't control the weights of our passengers," he said. "Passengers gain weight, but airlines are the ones that go on a diet. It's part of the conundrum we face right now."

___
 
Huh. I never would have thought of that. Maybe we should be charged by the pound. LOL. JK! It's a joke! Why don't they put a different limit on luggage then to counteract it?
 
I did my bit. I retired. The fuel savings alone should save my airline.
smile.gif
 
thats bogus... kinda makes sense tho.... I dunno, on a plane like a 737 or sumthin, does one SERIOUSLY overweight person make a huge difference? I mean like if they have to buy two seats, then your basically puttin like two 150 pounders on the plane, its just actually one person
 
Would the fed/airlines be all over this if oil was back at a realistic price? They are just giving the airlines an excuse to jack up prices again.
 
[ QUOTE ]
does one SERIOUSLY overweight person make a huge difference?

[/ QUOTE ] I think the point is that it's not one huge person, it's an extra 10 pounds on every passenger.
 
[ QUOTE ]
thats bogus... kinda makes sense tho.... I dunno, on a plane like a 737 or sumthin, does one SERIOUSLY overweight person make a huge difference? I mean like if they have to buy two seats, then your basically puttin like two 150 pounders on the plane, its just actually one person

[/ QUOTE ]\

Every pound takes some gas to haul. It's basic physics.
 
Every pound takes some gas to haul. It's basic physics.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know its basic physics, but my point is is that the word "obese" means highly overweight, not an extra 10 pounds here or there. obese is like a 5-4 woman at 300+lbs. Most people don't surpass that boundary
 
Obese for a 5'4" woman is like 180 pounds. But I think again, they are referring to the epidemic of overall heavier people not just a few really big ones.
 
Obesity is more costly than you think. Costs about 100 billion a year and most of that is burdened on the taxpayer. Why wasn't this spendy issue brought up this election?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Obesity is more costly than you think. Costs about 100 billion a year and most of that is burdened on the taxpayer. Why wasn't this spendy issue brought up this election?

[/ QUOTE ]

In terms of what? Federal laws against being fat?

You can have my love handles when you cut them from my cold dead hips.
 
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government has declared war on fat people.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, or the war on terra?

We've seen how effective those are.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government has declared war on fat people.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, or the war on terra?

We've seen how effective those are.

[/ QUOTE ]

The feds are planning on putting all fat people on a Pacific island.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government has declared war on fat people.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, or the war on terra?

We've seen how effective those are.

[/ QUOTE ]

And pretty soon the war on gays, atheists, and doctors.

Come on, obesity is a problem. The FAA mandates all airlines use a generic weight for all bodies. If this goes up the airlines lose. If the airlines lose, you lose. The fact of the matter is people need to take responsibility for their own actions. If you can't say no to a that next potato chip, what makes you fit to make any decision?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government has declared war on fat people.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, or the war on terra?

We've seen how effective those are.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you can't say no to a that next potato chip, what makes you fit to make any decision?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's about as brass-tacks as one can make it.
 
Ophir, I completly agree with you. I am tired of people trying to compare being obese with being gay or having Cancer. For the most part, people are obese becuase they choose to be. They might not WANT to be, but they simply do not have the self control/motivation to live a healthy lifestyle. They're not getting any sympathy from me.
 
Yeah, but what if I'm just naturally predisposed to eat hot wings, drink beer and sit in front of the laptop all day?

Sometimes, I uhh, don't think I have a choice.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Ophir, I completly agree with you. I am tired of people trying to compare being obese with being gay or having Cancer. For the most part, people are obese becuase they choose to be. They might not WANT to be, but they simply do not have the self control/motivation to live a healthy lifestyle. They're not getting any sympathy from me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this mean that fat people suffer from hand-to-mouth disease?
 
Fuel burn increases by as much as 10% of what ever weight you add. Many variables, such as stage length, but it works out to between 6 and 10%. I use 10% as my rough gouge for adding weight, be it fuel or what ever.

What that means is that if you have 100 more pounds, you burn 10 pounds more fuel. If you have 200 pax that after 20 pounds more each, that means you've burned 400 more pounds of fuel. That's 60 gallons. And I bet that we're talking about more weight/person than 20 pounds, plus the extra stuff people carry with them....
 
Back
Top