Fairchild Merlin IV vs King Air

1900 isn't the way the boss want's to go. We threw out the MU-2, any feedback on the Turbo Commander?
 
1900 isn't the way the boss want's to go. We threw out the MU-2, any feedback on the Turbo Commander?
Don't let the tail fall off:dunno:. In all seriousness, it's pretty darn small compared to everything else your talking about getting. I guess you didn't take my suggestion because it only has one motor. If you looking for the best haulin mo fo out there that can cost fractions in operating cost compared to the other options it's the best hands down.
 
Any Turbo Commander without the Dash 10 conversion is pretty much useless to you. Plus MX costs are outrageous. Best bet to stick to a Metro or King Air.
 
Any Turbo Commander without the Dash 10 conversion is pretty much useless to you. Plus MX costs are outrageous. Best bet to stick to a Metro or King Air.
Thanks, it would be a lease. But they are maintenance dogs? Any more info, please post or PM me thanks.
 
I talked with our director of MX, he said that just about any part is $5000. We used to have one in our Op Specs but got rid of it just because we weren't making money on it. But if you do some research you may find a prestine -10 conversion with a passenger side cargo door on it, used for medevac flights. It's not as roomy as a King Air but it is alot faster.

Edit: Also the AD's limit the spar inspection to 36 months and I've hear those are really pricey. I think there is a lifetime spar STC but not sure. They were dumb when they designed the airplane and stuck steel and aluminum next to each other. :banghead:
 
What is wrong with this:
TDC-3.jpg


That is a beautiful machine.....


b.
 
I am learning a lot from this thread. I am humbled.

Ignore the beasly and throw him a crumb now and then when it suits you.

I like this stuff; please keep talking!

Cordially,


b.
 
What about a Cessna 441 with -10's? Good fuel burn, good payload, and single pilot cert'd.

Edit: Does the 441 have a cargo door like the 404? I've only flown a couple hours in one and can't remember.
 
What about a Cessna 441 with -10's? Good fuel burn, good payload, and single pilot cert'd.

I was actually thinking this too. The 441 is a great machine I think. Also makes me wonder about Cheyennes - would they do the job and be cheaper?
 
I think the ultimate question is, how much cargo and how far are you going to take it??

Extra points on the san antonio sewer tube is that its a fairly ground loving airplane, sea le
vel and anything under about 4000 feet runway and your gonna be sweatin a lot. If you really watch the weight and temps you could do sea level and a 3500 foot strip but I would say to bring your michael jordan game.

Unimproved runways doubtful. Engines are torque limited on anything warmer or higher than sea level and about 20c, weights start coming down at I would venture a guess at 28c at sea level. Water meth injection works good lasts not long enough will get back what you loose due to temps or altitude but another system to maintain and fluid to buy and store.

Its a great airplane, not as hard to fly as people make it out to be, just busy on taxi and it won'thelp cover up mistakes in emergency situations a v1 cut is akin to rubbing your good luck charm, clenching the nearest person while cussing and praying all at the same time.

After 3 years in all kinds of weather in all corners of the us I can still say the airplane is a blast to fly, but with respect needed.
 
Worst case fields would be Chester or McCall Idaho for length/DA. Cargo, looking at a set of main mount tires for a P-3 or an APU (500 lbs) and a couple of maintenance guys or ViP mission with 4-5 folks and overnight bags.
 
Alright, got some more info on the AC690. There's an AD on the airplane limiting the airplane to 180kts in turbulence. Apparently a few lost their tail cones in severe turb and crashed. No issues with the CG fully loaded.

The guy I've talked to has never heard of a TPE-331 failure, but has heard of a couple PT-6 failures on the Caravan or King Air. He says the 331 is not for dummies. Really easy to hot start, but the 331 is way more efficient than the PT-6 and the 690 is faster than a King Air, so it's a double win.

Easy to fly, alot like the 500 (I'll vouch for that, like a Cessna 206 with two engines,) will climb on one engine, gear and flaps down.

The spar is an issue. You can get them with the 36-month inspection (a spar cap is installed to prevent corrosion) or have the entire spar replaced (no more inspections ever) but those are really pricey.

He says to expect to pay anywhere from $600k-$850k on a really good machine, one with all the work done, and if you do buy one, always get the pre-buy done at a Aero Commander service center, like Aero Air or Byerly.

As far as your cargo, I'm sure a wheel would fit no problem, its just the door is in the front and it would have to be strapped down in front if you have passengers, but it's really easy to load and shouldn't have a problem since the door is right off the ground.

I'm not sure if unimproved airstrips would be a problem. The main landing gear on the Commanders are virtually indestructible. The nose is a little bit more fragile (we've had a couple snap off when the line tried to tow with the parking brake set.)

If you have anymore questions, I'll be here all day!
 
Back
Top