Expressjet keeping the 69 airplanes

Press Release Source: ExpressJet Holdings

ExpressJet Announces Retention of 69 Aircraft and Conclusion of 2006 Rate Negotiations
Friday May 5, 4:16 pm ET


HOUSTON, May 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ExpressJet Holdings (NYSE: XJT - News) today announced that it delivered notice to Continental Airlines that ExpressJet would retain all of the 69 aircraft being released from the company's capacity purchase agreement with Continental. The company previously announced in December 2005 that Continental elected to reduce the number of aircraft covered by the agreement and that ExpressJet could elect either to retain aircraft or return them to Continental.
The transition of these aircraft from the capacity purchase agreement is scheduled to begin in December 2006 and to be complete by June 2007. The company intends to utilize the 25 ERJ-145LR aircraft and 44 ERJ-145XR aircraft to pursue various strategic options outside the capacity purchase agreement.

The company also announced that in April 2006 it concluded negotiations with Continental to revise the scheduled block hour rates for 2006 under the capacity purchase agreement. Consistent with the 2005 rates, ExpressJet will continue to receive payment for each scheduled block hour in accordance with a formula designed to provide it with an operating margin of 10% for its Continental Express operations. The rates are retroactive to January 1, 2006.

ExpressJet Holdings has strategic investments in the air transportation sector, including ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. and ExpressJet Services, LLC. ExpressJet Airlines operates a fleet of Embraer regional jets as Continental Express to 152 destinations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, and provides third-party training through its Training Services division. ExpressJet Services, LLC provides third-party repair services. The company is the sole stockholder of these subsidiaries and also invests in other entities that permit it to leverage the management experience, efficiencies and economies of scale present in its subsidiaries. For more information, visit expressjet.com .

Some of the statements in this document are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Many factors could affect actual results, and variances from current expectations regarding these factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Some of the known risks that could significantly impact results include: the company's dependence on its capacity purchase agreement with Continental; the company's dependence on Continental's financial and operational stability; the company's aircraft and facility leases with Continental; the company's ability to implement its growth and diversification strategies, including the profitable use of the 69 aircraft outside of the capacity purchase agreement; flight disruptions as a result of operational matters; regulatory requirements; and competition and industry conditions. Additional information concerning risk factors that could affect the company's actual results are described in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its 2005 annual report on Form 10-K. The events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a materially different extent than described herein. The company undertakes no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: ExpressJet Holdings
 
Sweeeeet. Sorry Chautauqua, no XR's for you!:p
Still, we're going to have an uphill battle to find flying for them. We're not out of the woods yet.
 
I don't know if I agree with putting company FILs on a public bulliten board....yeah I'm going to have to go with "not cool" on that one.
 
Chill, kids. It's not like he's revealing company secrets, just rah-rah propaganda designed to stem a mass exodus of personnel.
 
Okay, good news for XJT, but where exactly will these 69 jets be used?

If it's for new flying, then awesome.

If it's flying for another regional, "replacement" flying, then that's going to screw over another regional airline. The undercutting would continue, and the cycle will repeat.

I hope the 69 jets are NOT used to fill any current flying by regional airlines, because while that might be good for XJT, it screws over the other airline.
 
Cherokee_Cruiser said:
Okay, good news for XJT, but where exactly will these 69 jets be used?

If it's for new flying, then awesome.

If it's flying for another regional, "replacement" flying, then that's going to screw over another regional airline. The undercutting would continue, and the cycle will repeat.

I hope the 69 jets are NOT used to fill any current flying by regional airlines, because while that might be good for XJT, it screws over the other airline.

Although not based on any fact, I believe our management is either going to do something totally new or create some addition flying with a codeshare. I don't believe they are interested in getting into a bidding match with XYZ airlines for any legacy flying that already exists. I really don't see us winning a bidding match and our management knows it. If they really wanted to underbid then why not hit up the employees for pay cuts and underbid CHQ for the CAL flying that we lost, why take on the costs of setting up shop elsewhere? In my opinion XJT is looking beyond the normal realm of RJ flying.
 
Cav said:
Although not based on any fact, I believe our management is either going to do something totally new or create some addition flying with a codeshare. I don't believe they are interested in getting into a bidding match with XYZ airlines for any legacy flying that already exists. I really don't see us winning a bidding match and our management knows it. If they really wanted to underbid then why not hit up the employees for pay cuts and underbid CHQ for the CAL flying that we lost, why take on the costs of setting up shop elsewhere? In my opinion XJT is looking beyond the normal realm of RJ flying.
"It's an entirely different kind of flying... altogether." ;)

Bob
 
Actually I think they did, hence they're only using 25% of their aircraft for this (if FlyI is indeed the direction they move in). They could have pulled away from CAL completely eh?
 
John Herreshoff said:
Actually I think they did, hence they're only using 25% of their aircraft for this (if FlyI is indeed the direction they move in). They could have pulled away from CAL completely eh?

Um, "they" didn't pull away from CAL, CAL let them go.

Mesa is doing the same thing, albeit on a smaller scale, with Go! in HI.
 
Righto, but when CAL tried to pull the plug on ExpressJet didn't the contract say that EpxressJet could pull whatever they wanted away from CAL? Or was that just the 69 planes that they could do that with?
 
John Herreshoff said:
Righto, but when CAL tried to pull the plug on ExpressJet didn't the contract say that EpxressJet could pull whatever they wanted away from CAL? Or was that just the 69 planes that they could do that with?

I'm not familar with the contract both parties signed, but I would assume it was only for the aircraft that CAL was giving notice to.

ExpressJet Holdings Inc., the parent of regional carrier ExpressJet Airlines, said Friday it told Continental Airlines Inc. it intends to keep all 69 aircraft it leases from Continental.


The move follows an announcement from Continental last year, in which Continental said it was withdrawing the 69 jets from its capacity purchase agreement beginning this December. ExpressJet said then it could either keep or return the jets to Continental.

Reading that I think it was just for the aircraft in question. XJT has a contract to CAL to provide service, I wouldn't see how they can break the ENTIRE contract, just yet.


ExpressJet also said it completed negotiations last month with Continental to revise scheduled block hour rates under the capacity purchase agreement this year.
 
Back
Top