Apparently, you can't give a negative review of Tesla on X.Well maybe then it only seems like they’re doing good because they have so many censors hiding the bad news
You know, America's good time venue for savage freedom of speech? LOLZ.
Apparently, you can't give a negative review of Tesla on X.Well maybe then it only seems like they’re doing good because they have so many censors hiding the bad news
The irony, of course, is that the pre-Musk Twitter spent a lot of its money litigating on behalf of its users as regards free speech, against some regimes that I consider pretty unsavory, even. They spent a lot of time and effort defending anonymous and pseudonymous speech as well as the rights of their users.Apparently, you can't give a negative review of Tesla on X.
You know, America's good time venue for savage freedom of speech? LOLZ.
I've seen nothing to make me believe that manned fighters can be entirely replaced by droids.
Apparently, you can't give a negative review of Tesla on X.
You know, America's good time venue for savage freedom of speech? LOLZ.
Either way, we're just going to move along. Move along. Move along.Even if there are, they're probably not the ones we're looking for.
Tesla had plenty of censors, but when they tried more censers, the smoke kept getting in their eyes.Great! Different tech entirely. When Waymo was adding more censors, Tesla said "Supply chain issues? Let's see what we can do with fewer sensors" and then reliability tumbled.
I've seen nothing to make me believe that manned fighters can be entirely replaced by droids. The technology is not there, at least that I am aware of. Certainly not based on what any random citizen like Musk, using open source info has knowledge of. But I imagine this is another game of "I have an ulterior motive" (some drone spinoff for musk industries would certainly be profitable)
Tesla had plenty of censors, but when they tried more censers, the smoke kept getting in their eyes.